Viewer Question: “How do you explain that viruses are not contagious but that phage therapy use lab grown viruses to replicate in a host body and lyse bacterias?
Studies point that topical and IV use of phages are very effective against infectious states. They do not come from the body, yet the body incorporate them in a healing process. And why can’t the body produce those phages by itself? Why would it need exogenous micro-organisms?”
Phages are not exactly the same as normal cellular viruses. Bacteria can create their own solvents, known as phages, but their description as being a ‘bacteria eater’ is not good or correct terminology to use. Viruses cannot eat because they are not alive. Bacteria in the body can create phages, which are a type of virus similar to a regular cellularly created viruses, but intended for discarding toxic bacterium within and without. Bacteriophages are proteins that encapsulate a DNA or RNA genome, as a normal virus does, and have structures ranging from simple to complex. Their differences lie in their usage by the body. Lysis, partial cell dissolvment, or in complete toxicity—death, is achieved by an enzyme called endolysin, which allows the virus to dissolve a portion of a bacterial cell wall to enter it and dissolve matter. This does not necessarily mean the bacterial cell will perish. Science incorrectly states this is ‘hijacking’ the cell to replicate, but cells create viruses on their own without viral ‘infection’.
The bacterial cell foregoes its normal functionality in order to replicate viral solvents. Remember, if science claims a virus can dissolve a cell wall before replication in order to inject its genetic material, then it can dissolve specific toxins. Thus, their indirect admission is a glaring oversight in the nefarious Germ Theory of disease. The virus dissolves, and it does so by the body’s intelligence. Since viruses are not alive, they cannot inject, move, swim, or fly their way into a cell and intelligently infect cells, since viruses have no brain or survival function and must rely on a guiding agent, such as white blood cells, to guide and direct viruses to certain locations; guiding them to specific locations wherein the virus can come into contact with and via hydrophilic, or hydrophobic properties, absorb or repel the substance it is, or is not, compatible with; also known as Zeta Potential. The Zeta Potential represents the surface charge. This occurs in the presence of an aqueous solution when objects dissociate on hydrophilic surfaces or water ions adsorb onto hydrophobic surfaces; repel away from, or attract into. The actions of viruses are partially determined through DNA and RNA communication keys. Therefore, it is very much an intelligent symbiosis between body, cell, virus, and all therein.
Phages are a type of solvent, but they are not regular cellular solvents. The medical profession creates and uses synthetic bacteriophages, and this must be noted. The difference is that this man-made approximation behaves differently than a normal virus would in the human body and contains residual fluids from their artificial environment—most of which are toxic in nature that poison bacteria and cells. As such, bacteriophages that are placed subcutaneously into the body are more akin to poisons than helpers. This is because they are created in static lab environments, utilizing toxic serums in petri-dishes and other like environments.
Because they put bacterium and phages together in lab environments, and observe that bacteria die in their presence, does not mean the phage is responsible. It is the toxic environment that is composed of toxic serums that kill bacteria. Since this is so, if used in the body, these poisons may dissolve and eliminate beneficial bacteria such as E. coli existing in the gut, which feed the brain and nervous system. This is especially true when referring to exogenous solvents, which are not designed intelligently and specifically by the bodily system for their particular purposes. How can those that believe phage therapy works promise us that their treatment does not kill useful bacteria in the body? The truth is, they cannot.
The same can be said for antibiotics. Yes, they will kill bacteria responsible for infection, but infection is necessary to heal the body. Infection is a result, not a cause of illness. Infection is the body’s way of sending nutrients to the area of damage, utilizing pain and swelling, then using bacteria and cells to consume dead, dying, and toxic tissue and cells.
In the end, treatments utilizing phages are nothing more than a less harmful antibiotic. You could take bacteria out of the body, and place them within bacterial environments, and observe that those bacteria will grow and flourish and consume dead matter. Bacterium are living organisms that do not completely rely on a guiding agent to guide their behavior. Viruses are the exact opposite, and cannot act alone. They also claim that these phages can be sprayed on foods to help kill ‘harmful’ bacteria, such as E. coli. The problem is that it is not the virus, it is the chemical residues within the spray itself, which the virus also contains, that kills the bacteria. Otherwise, viruses are not alive to infect cells or bacteria on their own, especially outside the body. How could they directly kill bacteria outside the body when they have no nucleus, digestive or glandular function, and cannot ‘hijack and replicate’ in the less than dense bacterial colonies of raw meat? Therefore, they claim they are ‘eating’ the bacteria. There is no proof that such man-made viruses kill bacteria on poultry directly. In actuality, it is the chemical constituents themselves that are to account for bacterial death on raw foods.
In reality, all living cellular organisms, which includes bacterium, all contain the ability to manufacture and excrete solvent structures, known as viruses; non-living enzymes that specifically disassemble, break down and dissolve toxins—be they internally or externally incurred. Remember that these are engineered viral concoctions that bear no resemblance or action to cellularly created organisms or solvents. I would never take such treatment for fear that it would compromise and kill crucial and beneficial bacteria that help feed the brain and gut, and the rest of the body. I would not do so based upon the fact that these are merely poisons that damage ALL bacterium, and are much less predictable than they claim. In the end, we do not know the toll such man-made substances take on the DNA and genomic structure of cells and bacterium.