At this moment this is a free newsletter. If you find it useful and wish to support this effort, please do consider my book, or, you may also donate via PayPal by clicking the button below.

Thank you to everyone's support!

Issue #1:

What is Lyme Disease?
Can Vaccines be Weaponized via Insects?
What is Malaria?
5G Theory is Deceptive
Viral Functions

Released - 10/6/2020

Issue #2:

How Do Viruses Mutate?
Can Viruses be Isolated?
Koch's Postulates Flawed

Released - 11/27/2020

Issue #3:

Virus Studies/Trials
Double-Blind Studies
What Is The Evidence of Viruses Not Being Contagious?
Rabies: Is It Real?
Prions & Their Cause: Deceptive Science

Released - 12/26/2020

Issue #4:

Fraudulent Death Rates
Do Viruses Exist - Subversion in Alternative Study?
The Myth of Strains

Released - 02/03/2021

Issue #5:

Viral Replication & Testing
Vaccine Passports are Boldly Unlawful—Encroachment Upon Freedom
mRNA? DNA Alteration
A Question About the Nature of Viruses
Antibody Testing?

Released - 04/04/2021

37 Responses

  1. Please write or video about nutrition in detail. I’ve purchased your book and love it! Thanks to you, I’ve recently switched from a vegan diet of three years to mostly a carinvore diet with elements of primal raw diet.
    I’d love to hear you speak more in depth about nutrition and other health improving ideas.
    Thank you!

  2. Thank YOU for all of your hard work. I printed out your book and read it cover to cover (that is rare), I’ve watched all your videos, and read your blog. I have been sending links to your website out to all the heavy hitters on social media and my personal and business connections – hopefully some of them will read it. It is time for everyone to take their power back!!! I was born in the 60s … I remember life back then (society was healthy!!!). I did get the Measles Vaccine (late 60s or early 70s) – it put me in the hospital (I am glad it did … I haven’t had a vaccine since then)!!!

    1. That is really great to read… and thank you so much for sharing this information as you are. Word of mouth has really spread the message the past few months, and I think that’s the key. I hope you stay unvaccinated too, as will I.

      Thanks again!


  3. About 5G, the theory isn’t that 5G somehow create the coronavirus in the body, but that new electro magnetic radiations in the environment can temporarily modify the general body balance, and induce symptoms that can be attributed to an infection or weaken the immune system.
    There are many studies about the danger of EMR, even from the first ever deployed military radios.

    Beside health issues, there are many concerns surrounding 5G because it is a huge step in many areas like robotics, AI, central bank digital currencies, surveillance…
    This is multi billion dollar investment and countries must implement this new technology to be able to compete with others, this is a necessity for governments, and the coronavirus crisis really help in implementing it without too much protest from the public.

    1. Yes, and I agree with most of that, and it is a concern. But I do not subscribe to the idea that 5G is somehow much more dangerous than existing 4G, and that 5G is causing cells to produce coronaviruses. That is in fact what many of these people are claiming, and it is simply not correct, logically or scientifically.

  4. An extensive article have been published two days ago :
    Germ theory denial in the age of the COVID-19 pandemic

    Issue #3:
    What Is The Evidence of Viruses Not Being Contagious?

    “There are so many more sources it would take multiple pages, so I will leave it there. Suffice it to say, we’ve all been lied to all of our lives.”

    Your sources date back from prior the invention of the electron microscope, so it will be disregarded, but it raised some interest in the comments :

    So, if you have more things I’d be really interested in it.

    1. Have you read my book? The electron microscope cannot see viruses except in snapshot images. They cannot see their living processes. Scientists living before the electron microscope can still observe viruses through scientific observation outside the body, by observing the actions of the body over time, which shows the dissolution of toxic material by some (viral) bodily agent. In hindsight, viruses do not have to be seen under microscopy. At this time, even now, they cannot be seen in their living state. I addressed this in my video ‘Viral Misconceptions’. My sources stand and will stand forever. They cannot be disproven—they are the reality of nature.

    2. I have seen your video regarding the electron microscope and the Royal Rifes microscope too, some still claim that this microscope simply cannot work :
      because the visible light spectrum doesn’t light things as small as viruses, and that’s what I thought too.
      But this article explain pretty well how this whole thing works :,of%20human%20vision%2C%20it%20is%20%27invisible%27%20to%20us.

      This look amazing tbh, is this still produced somewhere ?
      I can’t believe this have just been forgotten.

      I’ve posted too much lol, you can delete replies to make the page more readable.

      1. There is a video I put in ‘Viral Misconceptions’ that is footage of a phagocyte taken through an actual Rife microscope. The article you linked to about Rife is another article done by a ‘fact-checker’ who did a poor job of fact-checking. If it did not work, there would not be footage of it existing. There were multiple Rife microscopes that were preserved (at the time). Now, when it comes to Rife’s claims about light, that is different with regard to the microscope working or not.

    3. Did you read the comments on the Disqus from ‘sciencebasedmedicine’, and observe just how hateful those people are? I did make a quick reply there and was viciously attacked by the mob. Those are the type of people that will attack you based upon your username, or a misplaced comma, or a grammatical error, instead of addressing the matter in a polite way. Tip: If you ever want to expose someone’s bias, watch what they pay attention to. If you make any error in your comment, or they dislike the color of your website, or you mistakenly list the year that something occurred, or misspell a word—whatever it may be—they will all lash out and claim your material is ‘invalid’ based on that alone. It happens all the time. That’s how these people operate. They do not care about the truth. Even if you were perfect in every way imaginable with all the right certificates and you went to medical college for years and graduated, and then decided that Germ Theory is inaccurate, they would pile on you and attack you as some conspiracy lunatic and disregard anything you write or say.

      1. They seem indoctrinated, the “denial” term is also a trigger word.
        Don’t really worry about it, some people will read the comments and figure out things for themselves.
        You don’t just rebuild the whole medical field in a day.
        Just leave your comment there and move, don’t fall for their baits.

        The author still never replied when pointed that an MSM center-left media claimed that the smallpox and variol on blankets doesn’t fit right with germ theory.

        They are demoralized people, they can’t come up with a conclusion to defend their own interest (Yuri Bezmenov), I don’t argue with them but try to bring more confusion in them, confusion or psychological shocks when possible, you must never fall for their baits and never attack them frontally as they are stuck in a false dichotomy.
        You could say for example that germ theory is some kind of a systemic racism perpetrated by white supremacists to prove their racial superiority lol (“quoting” The Atlantic newspaper regarding native Americans).

        Just my two cents, please DON’T publish this here.

    4. Thank you for your last comment. You’re absolutely correct, and it is pathetic how such people do not know how to have civil commentary in any way. I read a well-written comment from someone about the matter that I’d like to pass on.

      “Is a credible website?”

      “Short answer:

      No. It’s an echo chamber for the most regressive and insane ideas from Big Medicine. Like a cult or religious sect. Should be called faithbasedmedicine. org.

      Long answer:

      Appears to be an “astroturf” site that advances the cause of pharma-based medicine through methodical and often irrational assaults on all other approaches. The site is cloaked in an aura of scientific rigor, but is clearly a fierce and dogmatic defense of status quo allopathy. These guys are extremists and ideologues. Much of the editorial content is focused around discrediting, mocking, condemning. Little space is given to what they actually believe in. By process of elimination, they appear to believe in very little, seemingly only the most rigidly circumscribed allopathic orthodoxies.

      One of the main tactics is to lump all non-mainstream approaches together as “CAM”, as if they are some unified whole that can be easily dismissed. It’s a term of propaganda and belies the site’s alleged objectivity. They write sententious and overbearing articles heavy on technical jargon that look and sound convincing but are just hit pieces that often prove or settle nothing. They are ostensibly concerned with rooting out quackery, but only when it appears outside the mainstream system. They write article after article decrying the terrible evils of homeopathy and acupuncture, but scant few on the rampant corruption and iatrogenesis and quackery and lethality in conventional medicine. This hypocrisy kills credibility.

      The discussion threads that follow the articles are distinctly cultic. The rare dissenter is usually shouted down and mocked by the mob of regulars. In the absence of meaningful opposition and checks and balances, systems and groups usually drift toward fanaticism. The very idea of natural medicine sends them into convulsive fits. Nature is a dangerous hell that must be conquered and subdued, and its only value is in providing the raw material from which modern medicine can synthesize “real medicine” in a lab.

      Their belief is that people should only pay attention to what has been “proven” to work by rigged, industry-funded clinical trials, and that all health matters should be routed through your white-coat MD, the FDA, and their Pharma overlords. The site is an effective marketing and propaganda tool toward that end, but of little value to anyone with an open mind.”

      1. The internet is becoming more and more a compartmentalized echo chamber unfortunately.

        I’ve also noticed that wikipedia rebranded the terrain theory as “germ denialism” :
        Pathologization of counter view point is an interesting mechanism.

        Pro tip : don’t waste your time trying to edit wikipedia, or only publish things in the “discussion” to begin.

        I’d be glad to hear more about hand washing, I’ve read some things about “dead matter”.
        They first discovered that washing your hand to assist childbirth after performing an autopsy (on corpse) reduced postpartum mortality, how would you explain the processes involved ?

        1. Very true about the internet. When it comes to hand washing, they may observe that cleanliness may reduce some rare instances where outside bacterial sources would cause some level of infection (usually during surgery). In actuality, mankind has been giving birth long before the idea of ‘sanitation’ with no problem—many times live births on a farm with manure all around. Tribes, natives, and most other people long ago did not wash their hands routinely, including during birth and most activities such as eating, yet there was never a problem. The body cannot be cleansed of bacteria, and the notion that it can is another deception by the medical industry. Sanitation retards healing of wounds by killing bacterial colonies on the skin responsible for proper healing of tissue; preventing reformation of damaged cells, and cellular division. Cows, pigs, etc, are born into their own waste with no problem and thrive healthfully as a result. When taken out of their ‘dirty’ environment, they are seen to develop disease. When returned, the disease vanishes. Therefore, bacteria go hand-in-hand with health. When you observe the bacterial levels of modern man, you can see that almost all people in ‘civilized’ society have a great reduction in the proper rate of bacteria necessary for optimal functionality of the body; by trillions.

          When it comes to sanitation, it depends on what type of sanitation we’re talking about. Consider that when a baby is born, it passes by feces, blood, and fluids from the mother. This establishes a relationship with bacteria early on. Without this natural relationship, the child will not flourish healthfully. Also, consider that bacteria, enzymes, stem cells, and cells such as epithelial cells, and their precursors, exist in a healthy mother’s milk. These feed the baby and get it ready for the world it will enter. Of course, if the mother is not healthy, her milk will also be unhealthy.

          Naturally occurring bacterium do not negatively influence a child or mother during birth. However, the opposite is true when it comes to disinfectants, which used to contain mercury (or still do); products such as Merbromin and Merthiolate. Also, mercury exists in small amounts in chlorine bleach. Iodine, which is frequently used, is also a problem for tissue as it not a natural form of iodine and is toxic to the body. Only alcohol is the least toxic antiseptic, but still damages. Such disinfectants toxify tissue and cause infections to occur as the tissue tries to both heal and remove toxicity from the tissue. Scaring results much more readily from using these substances. Also, accumulated toxicity already present in the tissue (the skin, in particular), will pose a problem in healing; causing retardation of healing. This is because toxicity, such as aluminum, that deposits in the nerves of the skin, will be confronted by cells attempting to renew and heal the wound. When those cells are rebuilding tissue and then come into contact with these metals, they are poisoned to death or degenerated, which causes improper healing. So, the body must both remove this toxicity and heal the wound at the same time, which can lead to infection and improper wound healing. White blood cells may be sent to the area to help push that foreign debris from the tissue (infection). These are all things the medical industry does not consider. Their treatments cause 90%+ of these problems; either from accumulated vaccination or harsh and caustic chemicals used to sanitize tissue, which alters tissue from its natural state.

          Remember: When you have surgery or cut the skin, cells are damaged. During healing, if tissue is toxic, white blood cells must enter the area. As mentioned, if those cells come into contact with poisons embedded in the tissue there will be a problem. Those cells help push toxins out of the body via pus through the infection process. When you kill those cells in and on the tissue by using caustic disinfectants, the body does not properly swell and cause infection at the area of damage, which results in improper detoxification. Swelling, and pain, and sometimes infection, are necessary to heal any wound. Improper healing results and healthy cells surrounding the outside of the wound itself are also damaged.

          1. This is well known and documented that excessive sanitation doesn’t benefit the immune system, babies must be in contact with the germs of their mother to develop strong immunity, and some doctors advocate for inoculation of allergens in the early life of born child to reduce the allergy rate.
            Humans and animals always gave birth in non sanitized places, with lots of bacteria around, too much sanitation is a problem in our societies, it could even lead to auto immune diseases as the body can start to attack its own healthy cells in the absence of the healthy bacteria necessary to the general homeostasis.

            But humans and animals have always made a separation between what’s dead and alive, most particularly corpses and fecal matter.
            We know that corpses and fecal matter in contact with food and water can create epidemics, some even placed corpses in water sources to harm the people drinking that water.
            The first mention of fecal matter linked to diseases is linked back to the roman empire, and it’s now linked to cholera epidemics.

            Sanitation (don’t eat where you shit) and clean water sources are one of the most important factor in the eradication of diseases.

            Fact is : people already know about the terrain theory, it’s deeply implanted in the human psyche, when we fall sick, we say “we catch a cold”, not that a germ came in our body and made us sick, we know we have to boost our immune system before winter, and we know we must bury or burn corpses and to not shit where we eat.

            Hand washing as we know it today is only very new, from the 1980s’ and related to the HIV story apparently :

            But hand washing is a very very old practice, and present in numerous religious books.

            Soap was also discovered from corpses btw, because corpses contains agents that dissolve matter at heavy rates.

            You can put viruses and bacteria from someone into someone else body, those agents are usually beneficial and help treat many conditions, viruses can indeed be used as cleaning agents in people that can’t deal with an infection.
            We’ve even recently discovered that we can make pills with the fecal matter of healthy individuals and give it to people with crohn diseases and IBS to restore their gut flora.

            But when we come to rotten foods, dead corpses, fermented fecal matter, there is an other matrices involved to dissolve and transform those products into something else, and making your body interact with those products can have negative impacts.

            Actually from wikipedia :
            There is little evidence of microbiological contamination of groundwater from burial. Where dead bodies have contaminated water supplies, gastroenteritis has been the most notable problem, although communities will rarely use a water supply where they know it to be contaminated by dead bodies. Microorganisms involved in the decay process (putrefaction) are not pathogenic.

            The substances cadaverine and putrescine are produced during the decomposition of animal (including human) bodies, and both give off a foul odor.[4] They are toxic if massive doses are ingested (acute oral toxicity of 2 g per kg of body weight of pure putrescine in rats, a larger dose for cadaverine); there are no effects at all for a tenth of that dose.

            So the toxic products of decomposition is what’s harmful in the decomposition, not the microorganisms, but only in large doses.

            From the WHO itself :
            The rotting corpses of earthquake victims are a “negligible” threat to public health, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).

            And in many cases it only cause diarrhea (like food poisoning ?).

            So we have Ignaz Semmelweis, who first mentioned that hand washing could prevent mother death (I don’t actually see any data about newborns death rate, nor can find any data about his experiments actually), good article about him here :

            “Semmelweis didn’t answer all of the attacks of his critics, including that a large number of women in his maternity wards died between 1856 and 1858, even though the doctors were washing their hands. The deaths were later traced to poorly laundered linen though, not the doctors, after the laundry service for the hospital had been “released to the minimum bidder.””

            “he waited years to formally publish anything about his work. In fact, his treatise, The Etiology, Concept, and Prophylaxis of Childbed Fever, wasn’t published until 1860, which amazingly, is 13 years after he made his discovery!”

            So it’s not really convincing right now, but I guess we have way more new datas regarding the benefits of hand washing ?

            Found an interesting one here :
            “Handwashing is thought to be effective for the prevention of transmission of diarrhoea pathogens. However it is not conclusive that handwashing with soap is more effective at reducing contamination with bacteria associated with diarrhoea than using water only”

            So we have some data indicating that removing some material from hand could reduce the outcome of diarrhea, I don’t see how such small amounts could cause this, and the sample is a bit small but why not, let’s make the hypothesis that toxic material can enter the gut and that a purgative mechanism then occur in the body.

            Let’s see one big meta analysis on hand washing :

            “Only 14 (3.3%) of the publications reviewed reported studies linking hand washing to infection. ”
            So on 423 articles, only 14 found link between hand washing and the reduction of infection ? And hand washing only gained attention after the HIV crisis, when science admit that HIV doesn’t transmit by hands ?

            Let’s look deeper.

            “By the end of the 19th century, hand washing and antiseptic practices received such universal acceptance that experiments of the effectiveness of hand washing were apparently considered unnecessary or unethical. Evidence, therefore, is primarily anecdotal or ex post facto”

            So not many proofs, understandable, we won’t tests things like this if we believe it could lead to the deaths of patients.

            There are very few prospective clinical trials assessing a causal link between hand washing and risk of infection. This fact is almost certainly attributable to the work of Holmes, Semmelweis, Lister, Nightingale and others in the mid-19th century who effected dramatic reductions in morbidity and mortality from contagious diseases when they implemented hygienic interventions in health care. ”

            So back at the beginning, hygiene play a big role in the development of diseases, and we see that being clean improve the health of patients in a medical setting.

            But if it isn’t germs, bacteria, fungus and viruses, what are the mechanisms involved here ?

            What we see with the apparition of hand washing is a wide spread of the availability of clean water and increased concern of general hygiene measures, from the idea that we shouldn’t mix the clean with the unclean (dead and undead), we surely improved health of the general population and in medical settings.

            If washing your hands remove micro organisms, it also clean dirt and what I mentioned as “dead matter”, which is matter in decomposition from tissues and external material stick to the skin.
            It’s like infection during surgeries, what happens is that unclean matter, or matter that’s supposed to be on the outside of the body enter the inside of the body, which cause a reaction to put right back things at their places.

            But how could “dead matter” cause any symptoms in such small amounts, I don’t see how.

          2. You said in your post:

            “As we can see in the practices from WWI, they left the wound open and continuously cleaned it, it couldn’t ferment in a bandage, and the toxins were washed away very often, thus reducing mortality. Those are very good practices, and maybe it could even be improved by simply using clean water, but tests on toxins would have to performed.”

            I disagree with this conclusion… let me explain. Wounds are primarily healed by bacteria in and on the skin. Continually washing most wounds is not ideal because you are washing away bacterial cleansers and agents that rebuild skin tissue. I have often placed raw meat on wounds and noticed their healing quickened, turning properly into new pink skin. I have observed similar outcomes utilizing raw honey for skin cancers and raw meat applied to the skin. I have personally observed such cancer heal over a period of 1 year, if the size of the skin cancer was the size of a quarter. On that cancer, the bandage was replaced only once every few days. One’s own urine will also heal wounds more quickly. All these methods I have mentioned all have enzymes, nutrients, bacteria, and fat that go toward healing wounds fully and properly. Washing and sterilizing wounds too often is a step backwards. If a wound is festering, simply washing it in lemon juice once a day will reduce the over fermentation process possible with some wounds. We cannot always go by the so-called available history, because much of it is manipulated for ulterior motives. I first and foremost go by personal observation, and weigh it against the findings of others, if I have determined the true outcomes and legitimacy of the source.

          3. Uuh my answer is really too long, tldr, some toxins from bacteria can make you sick in very low amounts, like in the case of botulism :

            So this just explains much of it, toxins from bacteria makes you sick, and if you don’t keep a minimum of hygiene, the toxins from your body can make you sick.

            This is actually well documented that it’s not bacteria from corpses and rotten food that makes you sick but the toxins issued from them, unfortunately, I find so few data on this topic, maybe because we are stuck on the axiom of the germ theory of diseases.

          4. I’m still sifting through all your comments, but if I understand your conclusion correctly, it is that bacteria are not the cause of illness with regard to surgery or wounds—that is true. Rotting releases chemical byproducts of decomposition that can irritate and toxify mankind. See: Miasma. Science has tried to disprove miasma, but miasma is very real and is a fact of reality. If you do not believe that, then go put your face into a trash can full of trash for a while and tell me how you feel. It will affect you. It has nothing to do with bacteria or and living microorganisms. What you are smelling is the disintegration of tissue, which does involve biochemical and bacterial processes to break that tissue down. But, they are not a threat.

            You are going to have to really separate what you are told from mainstream medical sources and use your common sense, as it appears you are doing. So once again, it is not bacteria that cause disease in 99.9% of circumstances. It is always a toxin, whether a natural toxin or a manmade toxin. And almost always, manmade toxins are much more harmful. What you will continually see is the unproven static theory that bacteria will cause disease. But this is only theoretically true and is not proven. For if this was the case, I would be dead, since I have been eating raw meat, raw milk, and raw eggs for many years from all kinds of sources. My health has improved greatly as a result—the exact opposite of what they claim would happen. That is why you must be very skeptical about their so-called proof and claims when it directly contradicts observable results in nature.

  5. I finished the subtitles (in french) of your main video :
    (that’s why I was asking tons of questions btw)
    Consider uploading it on your youtube channel it would help me.
    You can download the video with the subtitles here :
    And I give you the subtitles in .srt too if it can be useful in anyway to you :

  6. Are we in the middle of a paradigm shift ? Will this event led us to a better comprehension of ourselves?
    We can only hope for, but that’s a long way.

    I have a question, how would you explain the so common loss of taste and smell we observe lately?
    Common colds always induce some loss of smell but never in those proportions, there is really something different with those symptoms, could it be a new pollutant in the air? Chemtrails ? Nano particules chemtrails ?

    I found this excellent article :
    This is very well written and contains solid sources, I think that’s a very good introduction to your writings.
    All of your explanations are very clear and logical, and everything can be checked and verified, but it would be really better if you included sources of your claims somehow, for example I have observed many similarities of your work (and sentences) with the work of Aajonus Vonderplanitz, yet I didn’t see him quoted once?
    You also claim that many people used your work without mentioning you, maybe include a Creative Commons License.

    1. Please read: – to understand why the loss of smell and taste can occur due to toxicity. To clarify: I have referred to Aajonus multiple times—in my book, my written interview with Alana Fournet, and personally directed people to his two books and lectures in my comments to them. On the front page of my website, I give credit to the Primal Diet for my health. I make it clear that I am a student of Aajonus, having followed his work for over 13 years. At the same time, all my thoughts outside of that are informed from multiple sources and personal knowledge gained through observation and is a branch off of Aajonus’s work, and others, and are my own informed thoughts. Creative Copyrights are created automatically when someone creates their own personal work. This is the nature of the internet when information is being spread, CC or not, and people will take the information for their own usage. What happened is, I was writing Reddit articles up to two years ago, and certain individuals passed around a whole article I had written without my name.

      When you refer to sources, I have many references in all of my writings from scientists, doctors, tests and studies, and so on. For instance, Issue #3 of my newsletter is source-driven and surrounds the topic of the supposed contagiousness of viruses.

      1. Thank you, that answer pretty well to my question.
        Also, in your main video, where does the footage featuring viruses liberated by a cell come from? At about 40mn. I’d like more information about it, what microscope was used, who recorded it ? Cause that’s the only footage of this kind I have ever seen and I’d like to see more things like this.

        About your book, I guess you already tried to publish it, you should sell it on amazon or something, maybe hire someone for your cover, your illustration could be improved, also add epub format for readers.

        1. The footage is from the Rife microscope and is a phagocyte releasing particles—they are not viruses—It would appear the same for any cell releasing viruses. My book: I have not published my book through any third party. Maybe you didn’t know, but Amazon is actively removing anti-vaccine material, so it is most likely a fool’s errand to even try on their service because it probably wouldn’t get past the Amazon review stage. They review all material before publishing. Again, that is why I publish directly. People buying my book can buy it directly from me with no problem. I have published directly, though perhaps I may do so one day. Epub: I can send that to anyone that needs it if they get the book, and they can email me and inform me, and I’ll gladly send them a different format. My illustrations are well-liked by everyone that has bought my book – – the cover is designed using symbology to illustrate the topics in the book, which covers the events taking place now and the intentions of those bringing it about.

          For the footage, search for ‘1996 Bare The Rife Beam Ray Device, Effects on Microorganisms raw microscope footage’

          1. What do you mean by particles?
            Yes I know about Amazon, it would just give you more credit if you were published, if any publishers is interested, and open your work to translations and wider diffusion.
            There is a window of opportunity right now with the pandemic maybe it’s the right time.
            Thanks I found the original video.

          2. The particles are most likely cytokines or something similar, or enzymes, or soluble debris leftover from the cell breaking down matter—it’s hard to tell honestly. Some of the organisms in that footage are in full-blown disintegration mode. Either way, the processes are the same for viruses being released by cells and would look almost identical, bursting out from the wall of the cell. I should do a video describing more clearly what is going on in the video, and compress it down so others understand it. It is quite a long piece of footage, but it is remarkable.

            I have actually been looking into getting the book onto other platforms like Amazon but was discouraged with all the trouble it seemed to take. I’m going to continue to look into it in order to get it on something like Amazon. Perhaps Amazon would allow the book to be sold, but from what I have recently seen with others, they have been removing works like mine.


  7. Having trouble finding your Jan 12th post.

    But it’s hard for me not to see excess death here.
    Since March, deaths seems to average 8-10k a day. Granted I think the lockdowns could be the main cause.

    Also interested to hear your thoughts on this:
    What would the equivalent of “absolute proof” needed to convince the public viruses are created in the body and not contagious?

    1. 8k is the normal rate of overall causes of death in the US each day. The excess death chart is PREDICTED, not final death counts. That is how misleading these people are. Go to their graph and you will see that their points are predicted numbers, not actual numbers.

      The video from Mike Lindell is mostly incorrect because the election was manipulated by Democrat leftists, and there is a repeating theme of that all throughout American history. China did not necessarily play a direct role unless they were hired to complete the task by Democrats. Further, if these tamperings did occur from China, would they have been ignorant enough to not use VPN services to hide their location? Unlikely. I stand by my belief that Democrats and Democrats alone were involved in the manipulation of the election. Anything else is a scapegoat to mislead conspiracy-minded people away from the truth and into the China narrative that those in power use against these groups.

  8. How do you explain that viruses are not contagious but that phage therapy use lab grown viruses to replicate in a host body and lyse bacterias?
    Studies point that topical and IV use of phages are very effective against infectious states.
    They do not come from the body, yet the body incorporate them in a healing process.
    And why can’t the body produce those phages by itself? Why would it need exogenous micro-organisms?

  9. Hello Jeff. Arrived here via Michael O Berenicia and my longstanding interest in natural health. However I did not know about terrain theory although having studied homeopathy for a short amount of time, I knew about the idea pf susceptibility. So this is the follow on in my journey. My emotional shock at the deep evil being perpetrated now will not pass easily- the more I read the worse it is. Thank you for all you do- you discovered a lot in a short time. I am glad I arrived here- take care of yourself. I look forward to reading everything you have written. May Great Spirit help us all .

  10. People like Jeff are why I wish I was filthy rich so I can promote them. Or, is that not how it works? In any event, Jeff, along with Dr’s Cowan, Lanka, Kaufman, Robert O. Young, Amandha Vollmer, David Crowe (RIP), Jon Rappoport have enabled me to see right through this scam. I am forever thankful

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *