Shine A Light Journal

Shine A Light Journal is a highly detailed and researched work
that mainly illuminates and expounds upon one topic.

Issue #2:
Contains 28 full-length pages

Topic: 'New Alternative Health'

Confronts Emerging Beliefs in 'New Alternative Health'
Rebuttal of Rappoport Article on Viruses
Rebuttal of Lanka and Kaufman on the Existence of Viruses
Covers Isolation Contradictions
Covers Pictures of Viruses & Exosomes (examples provided)
Covers the Existence of SARS-CoV-2 as Lab Creation
PCR Testing and False Positive Potential

Released - 06/05/2022

Note: This work is a PDF (digital) file.
Upon purchase you will be redirected to a download link.

Turn off your ad-blocker so that you are properly redirected.

If you experience a problem, please contact me immediately.

Shine A Light Journal is a highly detailed and researched work
that mainly illuminates and expounds upon one topic.

Issue #1:
Contains 10 double column pages

Topic: Isolation
Follow-up question by Amandha Vollmer
Essentials of Isolation
Isolation Defined

Released - 08/23/2021

Note: This work is a PDF (digital) file.
Upon purchase you will be redirected to a download link.

Turn off your ad-blocker so that you are properly redirected.

If you experience a problem, please contact me immediately.

Shine A Light Newsletter

You may download my past newsletters below

At the moment this is a free newsletter. If you find it useful and wish to support this effort, please do consider my book, or, you may also donate via PayPal by clicking the button below.

Thank you to everyone's support!

Issue #7:

Lab Leak Scandal
Epigenetics: The Future of Gene Alteration
Cell Cultures—CPE
Graphene Oxide?
Sanitation

Released - 08/03/2021

Issue #6:

Exposé: The ‘Science’ of mRNA—Macrophage/Cytokine Alteration
Sudden Shedding Explosion?
Part of my Story Explained
Viewer Comment Answered

Released - 05/22/2021

Issue #5:

Viral Replication & Testing
Vaccine Passports are Boldly Unlawful—Encroachment Upon Freedom
mRNA? DNA Alteration
A Question About the Nature of Viruses
Antibody Testing?

Released - 04/04/2021

Issue #4:

Fraudulent Death Rates
Do Viruses Exist - Subversion in Alternative Study?
The Myth of Strains

Released - 02/03/2021

Issue #3:

Virus Studies/Trials
Double-Blind Studies
What Is The Evidence of Viruses Not Being Contagious?
Rabies: Is It Real?
Prions & Their Cause: Deceptive Science

Released - 12/26/2020

Issue #2:

How Do Viruses Mutate?
Can Viruses be Isolated?
Koch's Postulates Flawed

Released - 11/27/2020

Issue #1:

What is Lyme Disease?
Can Vaccines be Weaponized via Insects?
What is Malaria?
5G Theory is Deceptive
Viral Functions

Released - 10/6/2020

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
87 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Susan
Susan
3 years ago

I find this fascinating! Thank you!

Jason Keefer
3 years ago

Please write or video about nutrition in detail. I’ve purchased your book and love it! Thanks to you, I’ve recently switched from a vegan diet of three years to mostly a carinvore diet with elements of primal raw diet.
I’d love to hear you speak more in depth about nutrition and other health improving ideas.
Thank you!

Deirdre Cavener
Deirdre Cavener
3 years ago

Thank YOU for all of your hard work. I printed out your book and read it cover to cover (that is rare), I’ve watched all your videos, and read your blog. I have been sending links to your website out to all the heavy hitters on social media and my personal and business connections – hopefully some of them will read it. It is time for everyone to take their power back!!! I was born in the 60s … I remember life back then (society was healthy!!!). I did get the Measles Vaccine (late 60s or early 70s) – it put me in the hospital (I am glad it did … I haven’t had a vaccine since then)!!!

Antonin
Antonin
3 years ago

About 5G, the theory isn’t that 5G somehow create the coronavirus in the body, but that new electro magnetic radiations in the environment can temporarily modify the general body balance, and induce symptoms that can be attributed to an infection or weaken the immune system.
There are many studies about the danger of EMR, even from the first ever deployed military radios.

Beside health issues, there are many concerns surrounding 5G because it is a huge step in many areas like robotics, AI, central bank digital currencies, surveillance…
This is multi billion dollar investment and countries must implement this new technology to be able to compete with others, this is a necessity for governments, and the coronavirus crisis really help in implementing it without too much protest from the public.

Antonin
Antonin
3 years ago

An extensive article have been published two days ago :
Germ theory denial in the age of the COVID-19 pandemic
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/germ-theory-denial-in-the-age-of-the-covid-19-pandemic/

Regarding
Issue #3:
What Is The Evidence of Viruses Not Being Contagious?

“There are so many more sources it would take multiple pages, so I will leave it there. Suffice it to say, we’ve all been lied to all of our lives.”

Your sources date back from prior the invention of the electron microscope, so it will be disregarded, but it raised some interest in the comments : http://disq.us/p/2e7j6yb

So, if you have more things I’d be really interested in it.

Antonin
Antonin
3 years ago
Reply to  Antonin

I have seen your video regarding the electron microscope and the Royal Rifes microscope too, some still claim that this microscope simply cannot work : https://sustainable-nano.com/2017/08/18/royal-rifes-universal-microscope-and-why-it-cant-exist/
because the visible light spectrum doesn’t light things as small as viruses, and that’s what I thought too.
But this article explain pretty well how this whole thing works Link

This look amazing tbh, is this still produced somewhere ?
I can’t believe this have just been forgotten.

I’ve posted too much lol, you can delete replies to make the page more readable.

Anto
Anto
3 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Green

They seem indoctrinated, the “denial” term is also a trigger word.
Don’t really worry about it, some people will read the comments and figure out things for themselves.
You don’t just rebuild the whole medical field in a day.
Just leave your comment there and move, don’t fall for their baits.

The author still never replied when pointed that an MSM center-left media claimed that the smallpox and variol on blankets doesn’t fit right with germ theory.

They are demoralized people, they can’t come up with a conclusion to defend their own interest (Yuri Bezmenov), I don’t argue with them but try to bring more confusion in them, confusion or psychological shocks when possible, you must never fall for their baits and never attack them frontally as they are stuck in a false dichotomy.
You could say for example that germ theory is some kind of a systemic racism perpetrated by white supremacists to prove their racial superiority lol (“quoting” The Atlantic newspaper regarding native Americans).

Just my two cents, please DON’T publish this here.

Antonin
Antonin
3 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Green

The internet is becoming more and more a compartmentalized echo chamber unfortunately.

I’ve also noticed that wikipedia rebranded the terrain theory as “germ denialism” : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germ_theory_denialism
Pathologization of counter view point is an interesting mechanism.

Pro tip : don’t waste your time trying to edit wikipedia, or only publish things in the “discussion” to begin.

I’d be glad to hear more about hand washing, I’ve read some things about “dead matter”.
They first discovered that washing your hand to assist childbirth after performing an autopsy (on corpse) reduced postpartum mortality, how would you explain the processes involved ?

Antonin
Antonin
3 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Green

This is well known and documented that excessive sanitation doesn’t benefit the immune system, babies must be in contact with the germs of their mother to develop strong immunity, and some doctors advocate for inoculation of allergens in the early life of born child to reduce the allergy rate.
Humans and animals always gave birth in non sanitized places, with lots of bacteria around, too much sanitation is a problem in our societies, it could even lead to auto immune diseases as the body can start to attack its own healthy cells in the absence of the healthy bacteria necessary to the general homeostasis.

But humans and animals have always made a separation between what’s dead and alive, most particularly corpses and fecal matter.
We know that corpses and fecal matter in contact with food and water can create epidemics, some even placed corpses in water sources to harm the people drinking that water.
The first mention of fecal matter linked to diseases is linked back to the roman empire, and it’s now linked to cholera epidemics.

Sanitation (don’t eat where you shit) and clean water sources are one of the most important factor in the eradication of diseases.
https://learntherisk.org/vaccines/diseases/ https://archive.vn/BNogu

Fact is : people already know about the terrain theory, it’s deeply implanted in the human psyche, when we fall sick, we say “we catch a cold”, not that a germ came in our body and made us sick, we know we have to boost our immune system before winter, and we know we must bury or burn corpses and to not shit where we eat.

Hand washing as we know it today is only very new, from the 1980s’ and related to the HIV story apparently : https://thehimalayantimes.com/lifestyle/health/handwashing-a-brief-history-and-method/

But hand washing is a very very old practice, and present in numerous religious books.

Soap was also discovered from corpses btw, because corpses contains agents that dissolve matter at heavy rates.

You can put viruses and bacteria from someone into someone else body, those agents are usually beneficial and help treat many conditions, viruses can indeed be used as cleaning agents in people that can’t deal with an infection.
We’ve even recently discovered that we can make pills with the fecal matter of healthy individuals and give it to people with crohn diseases and IBS to restore their gut flora.

But when we come to rotten foods, dead corpses, fermented fecal matter, there is an other matrices involved to dissolve and transform those products into something else, and making your body interact with those products can have negative impacts.

Actually from wikipedia : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_risks_from_dead_bodies
There is little evidence of microbiological contamination of groundwater from burial. Where dead bodies have contaminated water supplies, gastroenteritis has been the most notable problem, although communities will rarely use a water supply where they know it to be contaminated by dead bodies. Microorganisms involved in the decay process (putrefaction) are not pathogenic.

The substances cadaverine and putrescine are produced during the decomposition of animal (including human) bodies, and both give off a foul odor.[4] They are toxic if massive doses are ingested (acute oral toxicity of 2 g per kg of body weight of pure putrescine in rats, a larger dose for cadaverine); there are no effects at all for a tenth of that dose.

So the toxic products of decomposition is what’s harmful in the decomposition, not the microorganisms, but only in large doses.

From the WHO itself : https://slate.com/news-and-politics/1999/08/are-dead-bodies-dangerous.html
The rotting corpses of earthquake victims are a “negligible” threat to public health, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).

And in many cases it only cause diarrhea (like food poisoning ?).

So we have Ignaz Semmelweis, who first mentioned that hand washing could prevent mother death (I don’t actually see any data about newborns death rate, nor can find any data about his experiments actually), good article about him here : https://vaxopedia.org/2017/07/31/who-was-ignaz-semmelweis/

“Semmelweis didn’t answer all of the attacks of his critics, including that a large number of women in his maternity wards died between 1856 and 1858, even though the doctors were washing their hands. The deaths were later traced to poorly laundered linen though, not the doctors, after the laundry service for the hospital had been “released to the minimum bidder.””

“he waited years to formally publish anything about his work. In fact, his treatise, The Etiology, Concept, and Prophylaxis of Childbed Fever, wasn’t published until 1860, which amazingly, is 13 years after he made his discovery!”

So it’s not really convincing right now, but I guess we have way more new datas regarding the benefits of hand washing ?

Found an interesting one here Link

“Handwashing is thought to be effective for the prevention of transmission of diarrhoea pathogens. However it is not conclusive that handwashing with soap is more effective at reducing contamination with bacteria associated with diarrhoea than using water only”

So we have some data indicating that removing some material from hand could reduce the outcome of diarrhea, I don’t see how such small amounts could cause this, and the sample is a bit small but why not, let’s make the hypothesis that toxic material can enter the gut and that a purgative mechanism then occur in the body.

Let’s see one big meta analysis on hand washing Link:

“Only 14 (3.3%) of the publications reviewed reported studies linking hand washing to infection. ”
So on 423 articles, only 14 found link between hand washing and the reduction of infection ? And hand washing only gained attention after the HIV crisis, when science admit that HIV doesn’t transmit by hands ?

Let’s look deeper.

“By the end of the 19th century, hand washing and antiseptic practices received such universal acceptance that experiments of the effectiveness of hand washing were apparently considered unnecessary or unethical. Evidence, therefore, is primarily anecdotal or ex post facto”

So not many proofs, understandable, we won’t tests things like this if we believe it could lead to the deaths of patients.

“DISCUSSION
There are very few prospective clinical trials assessing a causal link between hand washing and risk of infection. This fact is almost certainly attributable to the work of Holmes, Semmelweis, Lister, Nightingale and others in the mid-19th century who effected dramatic reductions in morbidity and mortality from contagious diseases when they implemented hygienic interventions in health care. ”

So back at the beginning, hygiene play a big role in the development of diseases, and we see that being clean improve the health of patients in a medical setting.

But if it isn’t germs, bacteria, fungus and viruses, what are the mechanisms involved here ?

What we see with the apparition of hand washing is a wide spread of the availability of clean water and increased concern of general hygiene measures, from the idea that we shouldn’t mix the clean with the unclean (dead and undead), we surely improved health of the general population and in medical settings.

If washing your hands remove micro organisms, it also clean dirt and what I mentioned as “dead matter”, which is matter in decomposition from tissues and external material stick to the skin.
It’s like infection during surgeries, what happens is that unclean matter, or matter that’s supposed to be on the outside of the body enter the inside of the body, which cause a reaction to put right back things at their places.

But how could “dead matter” cause any symptoms in such small amounts, I don’t see how.

Antonin
Antonin
3 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Green

Uuh my answer is really too long, tldr, some toxins from bacteria can make you sick in very low amounts, like in the case of botulism : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botulism

So this just explains much of it, toxins from bacteria makes you sick, and if you don’t keep a minimum of hygiene, the toxins from your body can make you sick.

This is actually well documented that it’s not bacteria from corpses and rotten food that makes you sick but the toxins issued from them, unfortunately, I find so few data on this topic, maybe because we are stuck on the axiom of the germ theory of diseases.

Nate
Nate
2 years ago
Reply to  Antonin

Botulism is created by decaying dead tissue in things like canned food. Same theme: bacteria can create deadly poisons outside the body (remember the digestive tract also is topologically outside the body), but such bacteria do not thrive in healthy living tissue. Thus germ theory and “immune system” are nonstarters. What they call the immune system is better called a janitorial system, and the lymphatic system is the garbageman.

ted
ted
2 years ago
Reply to  Antonin

Ah yes, the good Dr ?
Funny how history tends to repeat itself.
Think of the following quotation ascribed to Sir Thomas More ,King Henry V111`s Lord High Chancellor of England,when on trial for his life for serving God not the King , where he says to his erstwhile colleague Sir Richard Rich , bribed with the Office of Attorney General of Wales to betray him, “It profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world …but for Wales ,Richard ? ” ( “A Man for All Seasons”,R.Bolt).

Antonin
Antonin
3 years ago

I finished the subtitles (in french) of your main video : https://tube.anjara.eu/videos/watch/d6f39718-5c3d-4dbb-bda8-8c1b3e785dac
(that’s why I was asking tons of questions btw)
Consider uploading it on your youtube channel it would help me.
You can download the video with the subtitles here : https://tube.anjara.eu/download/videos/d6f39718-5c3d-4dbb-bda8-8c1b3e785dac-1080.mp4
And I give you the subtitles in .srt too if it can be useful in anyway to you : https://files.catbox.moe/56an64.srt

Antonin
Antonin
3 years ago
Harrys
Harrys
3 years ago

Are we in the middle of a paradigm shift ? Will this event led us to a better comprehension of ourselves?
We can only hope for, but that’s a long way.

I have a question, how would you explain the so common loss of taste and smell we observe lately?
Common colds always induce some loss of smell but never in those proportions, there is really something different with those symptoms, could it be a new pollutant in the air? Chemtrails ? Nano particules chemtrails ?

Ranting:
I found this excellent article : https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/why-only-thing-influenza-may-kill-germ-theory
This is very well written and contains solid sources, I think that’s a very good introduction to your writings.
All of your explanations are very clear and logical, and everything can be checked and verified, but it would be really better if you included sources of your claims somehow, for example I have observed many similarities of your work (and sentences) with the work of Aajonus Vonderplanitz, yet I didn’t see him quoted once?
You also claim that many people used your work without mentioning you, maybe include a Creative Commons License.

Harrys
Harrys
3 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Green

What do you mean by particles?
Yes I know about Amazon, it would just give you more credit if you were published, if any publishers is interested, and open your work to translations and wider diffusion.
There is a window of opportunity right now with the pandemic maybe it’s the right time.
Thanks I found the original video.

Nate
Nate
2 years ago
Reply to  Harrys

Medicine lumps together three very different types of symptoms: 1) actual damage or loss of function (e.g., necrosis, blindness), 2) messages from the body in an attempt to advise on your behaviour (e.g., pain, nausea, loss of appetite), and 3) elements of detoxification and repair processes (e.g., inflammation, swelling, fever, coughing, sneezing).

While loss of taste and smell could conceivably be 1 (damage), in a flu they are almost always 2 (a communication from the body). The body tells the person to stop eating, because most people have plenty of fat reserves to live off of for weeks or months and digestion takes a lot of work and busies the organs of detoxification greatly.

As usual, medicine interprets all symptoms as 1 when they are mostly 3 and 2.

Philosopher Newport
Philosopher Newport
2 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Green

“I tell everyone: When you are sick, and are detoxifying, you must force-feed yourself raw cleansing foods.”

Forcing anything is a form of resistance. When you are ill, get out of the body’s way and let it do its work. If you hanker for something to eat, obey your body. If you DO NOT hanker for something and instead feel nauseous, obey your body and don’t eat anything. The body knows what it is doing when it tells you to avoid eating. It knows its priorities. I had a terrible flu in 1999 when I didn’t eat or drink for 4 days but I recovered, and 22 years on I am fit as a fiddle (and I’ve been smoking for 42 years).

The human being will never be smarter than the human body or animal body or plant body by virtue of the fact that the human did not create those things. If you think you’re gonna figure everything out and are gonna avoid illness & disease forevermore, you’re setting yourself up for a rude awakening.
The main thing we are learning during this paradigm shift about health is that adding things to the body in an attempt to make it healthier, or in an attempt to recover quicker from an illness, is a form of getting in the way of natural processes. You are NOT smarter than the body. You, the human, did not design it.

We as a race of species have been alive for 100s of thousands of years and made it to the 18th century without xrays, pharma-meds, vaccines, pill-vitamins, pill-minerals, yearly check-ups, diabetic or cancer screenings, insulin shots, radiation or invasive surgery. We’ve survived with raw foods, cooked foods, smoking, drinking, plant-based-drugs, pollution from volcanoes, dust storms, pollen clouds, hordes of locusts…wars, rumors of wars, obscenely unhygienic conditions, disinformation, misinformation, psy-ops…

Another thing we are learning is that it is best to reject the perception that there is a common human body — there is not. Every single body is a unique, subjective health system. It is erroneous to assume that what you have figured out about YOUR body will apply to everyone else’s. Ditto for the so-called immune system: Your entire body from head to feet is the immune system. There is no central, localized “immune system”. Your whole body is the immune system. There is no such thing as boosting it. Just eat sensibly (what you hanker for), get plenty of good, deep sleep, and keep your stress level of worry & negativity low enough to keep it from overwhelming you. When you do get sick, DO NOT add anything to the body. Stay out of the way and let the body do its thing. Illness is the body’s way of purging an assault to its system. Obey the body. If it tells you to not eat, then don’t eat. DO NOT suppress the symptoms. They are the means by which the body is cleansing and healing itself.

“Preventative Medicine” is a form of hypochondria. It is fear-based. It’s the wrong outlook towards the body & life itself. Its basis rests on a war-model >> Mother Nature is dangerous & pathogenic & contagious. The body is fragile & vulnerable and devoid of intelligence and can’t possibly protect itself or repair itself or recover from an assault without the expertise & intervention of mankind.

The only expert of health anyone will ever be is the expert of YOUR OWN health — and even then you won’t figure everything out. You’re not meant to. This nightmare was intended to be mysterious & adventurous. There are innumerable moving parts that you simply cannot see all at once and will never be able to isolate and line up like ducks in a row.

There seems to be two types of people when it comes to health: Those who dislike consuming medicinal products, and those who are helplessly fascinated with pills & potions & herbs & tablets & syrups & mixtures & recipes & concoctions…

I appreciate your efforts to rectify & replace over a century’s worth of medical misinformation (TRUE medical misinformation, not the Youtube kind!).

You consider a Greek dude as a kind of health mentor (can’t remember his name) — but how do you reconcile his assertion that HIV (“AIDS virus”) was created in a lab involving leukemia? How can he possibly not know about the HIV scam? There was no virus whatsoever!

So Jeff believes in a God…..and believes in Satan, too….Would you agree that only God can create life? Certainly Satan does not have the power to create life, right? And what is LIFE? Is it not consciousness? Consciousness is a thinking-feeling entity who is aware that it is a thinking-feeling entity. All living creatures, from the macro to the micro, are conscious entities. Believe it or not, the microorganisms in and on our bodies are conscious entities just like you and me. Only God can create them. Satan cannot. Satan can pretend to! Satan can CLAIM to have such powers, but it’s all a clever deceit & fraud.

God never created a virus. A virus is described as a pathogenic, contagious microorganism. It’s ONLY purpose is murder >> to ruin the health of the host it infects. There is no other creature on earth that lives this way; no other creature on earth whose sole purpose for existing is to find a host and kill it — and thus kill itself! God did not create it. Satan and man are unable.

I certainly do not believe in any God or Satan but have used those terms to speak in a language you would understand since you have elsewhere announced your belief in such things. The bottom line is: There are no kamikaze micro-creatures — such things would be contra-life, anti-life, anti-Nature >> not even parasites seek to destroy their host, in fact, there is some suggestion they do their best to not overwhelm their host lest they kill their home & food supply!

Jonathan S
Jonathan S
3 years ago

Having trouble finding your Jan 12th post.

But it’s hard for me not to see excess death here. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm
Since March, deaths seems to average 8-10k a day. Granted I think the lockdowns could be the main cause.

Also interested to hear your thoughts on this: https://www.bitchute.com/video/1KQpm4kDMAEh/
What would the equivalent of “absolute proof” needed to convince the public viruses are created in the body and not contagious?

Harrys
Harrys
3 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Green
Marcea
Marcea
3 years ago

Hi Jeff,

First thank you for sharing your hard work on the real issues of viruses and bacteria.

What are your thoughts on magnesium oils? is it toxic to the human body?

Thank you.

Leclerc
Leclerc
3 years ago

How do you explain that viruses are not contagious but that phage therapy use lab grown viruses to replicate in a host body and lyse bacterias?
Studies point that topical and IV use of phages are very effective against infectious states.
They do not come from the body, yet the body incorporate them in a healing process.
And why can’t the body produce those phages by itself? Why would it need exogenous micro-organisms?

Leclerc
Leclerc
2 years ago

Is genetic real? Can you genetically modify an organism?

Gaynor Rose
Gaynor Rose
2 years ago

Hello Jeff. Arrived here via Michael O Berenicia and my longstanding interest in natural health. However I did not know about terrain theory although having studied homeopathy for a short amount of time, I knew about the idea pf susceptibility. So this is the follow on in my journey. My emotional shock at the deep evil being perpetrated now will not pass easily- the more I read the worse it is. Thank you for all you do- you discovered a lot in a short time. I am glad I arrived here- take care of yourself. I look forward to reading everything you have written. May Great Spirit help us all .

John
2 years ago

People like Jeff are why I wish I was filthy rich so I can promote them. Or, is that not how it works? In any event, Jeff, along with Dr’s Cowan, Lanka, Kaufman, Robert O. Young, Amandha Vollmer, David Crowe (RIP), Jon Rappoport have enabled me to see right through this scam. I am forever thankful

Nate
Nate
2 years ago

Why do people get colds and chicken pox at around the same time (on a shorter timescale than seasonally)? Yet why couldn’t the US Army infect people with influenza despite their best attempts at swapping snot from patients to healthy people?

I think I finally have a good answer: Picture a nomadic hunter-gatherer tribe. In detox season (flu season) if one guy gets sick at a time, they can’t just leave him there, they have to stop nomading and wait for him. Then for the next guy and the next. The tribe will be stuck in place for a long, unpredictable amount of time.

To prevent this, we should expect the body to coordinate its flu timing with the other members of the tribe who need a detox. This doesn’t apparently happen through mucous and saliva, and it’d be a pretty silly way to signal. More likely people just use pheromones, as that’s an established signalling pathway.

Whether a tribe member came down with the flu would then be a function of

1) How much does their body need a cleaning?

2) What percentage of the people they spend time with daily are sending out the cleaning signal versus a don’t-clean-now signal.?

Simple multiply those together and the result is how likely they are to come down with a flu in the next few days.

This explains why the military couldn’t infect anyone. The healthy volunteers spend 99% of their time around their healthy buddies who aren’t putting out the “let’s detox!” signal, and just for a few minutes they go in to hang out with sick people and get green mucous stuck up their noses and down their throats. The body obviously isn’t expecting a signal like that. It’s receiving a pheromonic “let’s detox!” signal from the sick people but it’s totally drowned out by the “let’s not detox!” signal from the people they spend most of their time with.

So sure, in a single office or single school class or a single very serious judo club that rolls together for hours a day and then hangs out at night as well, the pheromone signalling can get a bunch of them to detox at once (perhaps all of them, but some will be asymptomatic). Nothing to do with viruses, mucous, etc.

Even in total isolation a flu can happen, of course because the body does want to regularly clean itself especially if eating civilizational foods. People being around just influences the timing.

John
John
1 year ago
Reply to  Jeff Green

Hi Jeff, amazing work. My question has to do with the statement “You can only sync detoxification insofar as sharing emotional signals, traumas, stressors, sharing the same foods, environment, and so forth. The reason that flu seasons occur is due to changes in temperature and humidity; the cycles of life.” from the previous reply.

Let’s say that a whole family experiences symptoms of what they call “stomach flu” ‘aka’ norovirus in the same few days. Also, let’s say that it’s in the middle of summer. Do you not believe then that this is due to some sort of vibratory resonance and not the weather? Would that fall under emotional signals? Please elaborate. Thanks!

Jack
Jack
2 years ago

Hi Jeff, thank you for all your excellent research and the information you have shared. I’m new to this and find that “ring of truth” to it, so I’m drawn to learn more. I was sharing some basics with my friends and one asked me “what about STD’s?” I had no answer for them because it seems people do get STS’s, which I’m assuming are bacteria? But people talk about HIV and herpes as viral infections. I’d be interested in your understanding in this regard.

I am continuing to learn more from your web site and your book.

Thank you!

Philosopher Newport
Philosopher Newport
2 years ago

This is quite shocking, Jeff:
“If your advice is to simply not eat, then you will die.”
Sorry, but that is horrifically wrong. Ever studied fasting? Ever studied survivors pulled from wreckage after a week of no water or food? Ever studied “spiritual” disciplines involving fasts lasting up to a month or longer?

“Force-feeding is necessary in many cases, whether you claim it is “resistance” or not. The repulsion to food while sick is almost always from cooked food, which can turn someone off of eating anything because they are hard to digest and their smell is unpleasant when sick—the opposite is usually true in raw foods.”

I can assure you, whether food is cooked or not, my repulsion to food when ill with a flu is total: Can’t even bear to nibble on a dry cracker or piece of bread — and I AM ALIVE TODAY as if I have never been ill a day in my life.

Your idea about force-feeding is heinous and dangerous advice: My wife believes as you do — as if the body is a mechanical machine that runs on a combustible engine and if the fuel runs out then the machine DIES — and because of that Neanderthal belief, I have watched her kill our ill cats by force-feeding them until they had something like strokes. She honestly believed that it was wrong for them to refuse to eat whilst ill — as if they are dumb ignorant beasts whose bodies lack any kind of innate intelligence.

The difference between those who die from hunger strikes and those who don’t die after a month or more of fasting is the fact that the hunger strike is rooted in negativity & fear but the fasting is rooted in positivity & optimism.

You actually believe a human can be smarter than a God-created body? You actually believe God fell short when creating the bodies? You actually believe God made mistakes — made dumb bodies that depend on the “wisdom” of man to look after them?

Obey your body and stop pretending you are smarter than it. Judging by your comments & blogs, you have suffered considerable pain & anxiety in your life — and I am guessing it’s because you micro-manage your mind & health. Too many assessments. Too many adjustments. Too much fiddling with the knobs.

When the body is ill, it is because it is detoxifying — it is eliminating something that has gone inside the body via an orifice or the skin. Now the body wants you to STOP putting anything inside it or upon it — it was your putting something inside or upon it that has made you ill and therefore it is only logical to STOP putting “helpful” things inside or upon it so your body can clean itself out.

Ever heard of David Crowe? He was a fabulous researcher about the Virus Fraud and he died last year of cancer. He was afraid to fast because he thought the body needed food to fight the cancer. He was wrong, obviously. It has been said fasting is very beneficial for helping the body to eliminate cancer — and fevers, too, it’s been said they have cleared up some cancers. But fasting ain’t AMA approved is it? Fasting is the opposite to the common erroneous practice of DO SOMETHING, ANYTHING! Don’t just do nothing! Cram something “helpful” into the body! The body is missing an essential element — it needs your expert help! It needs a special mushroom or colored tea or a cappuccino enema!

People are responsible for themselves. As for the argument that obeying the body could lead someone to eat in unhealthy ways: They must learn by experience. If you eat something that makes you ill or uncomfortable, you stop. There is a difference between obeying the body and obeying the psychological urge to comfort-eat. Either way, if the body doesn’t like what you’re feeding it, it will let you know. If you ignore what it tells you, you pay a price of pain. But let’s stick to just the issue about obeying the body whilst ill: Eat what it tells you to eat (what you hanker for) even if it seems silly or unwise, and don’t eat when it tells you to don’t eat.

The epitome of simplicity, fearlessness and good news for all living creatures — that is what the Truth is composed of. Mankind has obscured the Truth with misinformation, disinformation, willful ignorance and deliberate fraud — and loads of fear-based, complicated assumptions, fallacies, theories and bad ideas about health (and our very reason for being spirits in this material world).

Next I am going to comment on your blog about the Nature of Mankind and Reality.

Cheers.

Sami
Sami
2 years ago

Thanks for these valuable information. I have a question about viruses from labs. As it is becoming a popular theory that the virus was built In a lab and weaponized in Wuhan lab. But we know viruses are not contagious and nor can they isolate a virus even if they wanted to. So how do we understand or replay to such, knowing that even if it was weaponized it is not contagious

Akon
Akon
2 years ago

Hello, I was wondering a simple thing.

Why does antibiotics works in “H.Pylori infections”, that bacteria present in 50% of the population.
Well, it doesn’t work all the time, some people “relapse”, but some are said to be without symptoms for a long time after a simple treatment of antibiotics and other drugs reducing stomach acidity.
What do you answer to someone that was actually treated efficiently by this?

Akon
Akon
2 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Green

Yeah but in some cases antibiotics stopped their symptoms for extended periods of time with no relapses.

Also I was wondering about parasites, such as Tenia or Schistosomiasis, do you think they come from inside the body or outside?
I saw you mentioning this somewhere.

Vincent
Vincent
2 years ago

any June 2021 newsletter available??

Vince
Vince
2 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Green

Thank you, Jeff!

goldenratio
goldenratio
2 years ago

Jeff – Do you have any knowledge on the virology experimental methods that rely on observed cytopathic effect (CPE) to declare the presences of viruses in cell cultures? For onlookers here, the first step of such experiments is the injection of fluids from a sick patient into a dish containing immortalized monkey or fetal cell lines. From there, this approach is based on the shaky notion that observation of cell degradation is indicative of “viruses” replicating and consuming the culture, whereas in reality these are likely just cells breaking down due to removal of their nourishment and addition of toxic materials/antibiotics. This cell degradation, which is observed visually, is called CPE.

I came across the papers below regarding the PCR test and it is clear that the probability of a PCR “positive” result is directly proportional to the cycle threshold (Ct value). Furthermore, the prevalence of observed CPE among the positive results is also tied to the Ct value. Namely, there is a higher prevalence of CPE among the batches which test positive for lower Ct values. Intuitively, this tells me that if the PCR flags a positive with a lower Ct value, it is likely that the cells were breaking down (i.e., CPE is happening) which in turns means there is a higher likelihood the PCR test will detect the genetic fragment in the target primer. In other words, my impression is that CPE indicates a higher presence of cellular debris which means it is easier for the PCR to detect the target and give a “positive” result. The converse holds true with higher Ct values according to the logic. Do you agree with this reasoning?

[1] https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10096-020-03913-9.pdf
[2] https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/34120026/ciaa1491.pdf

One last thing: Do you know if CPE has any correlation with the patient having observable symptoms of being sick? These papers keep talking about “positive cell cultures,” but this is nothing more than CPE and what really matters is if the patient is sick. Who cares if there is CPE if the person isn’t displaying symptoms of illness!

goldenratio
goldenratio
2 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Green

Thanks for the reply Jeff and expanding on what the viruses, which are really just enzymes that mainly help with detoxification, are actually doing. I am really trying to get down to the fundamentals of the mRNA/DNA vaxx design and PCR test design processes, which both fundamentally come from the CPE experiments and genomic sequencing methods. I am of the opinion that dissecting this route is the most potent method of taking down this fraud since it gets at the most fundamental level and undermines both the fake tests and injections in one shot. I’ve been watching Lawyer Reiner Fuellmich’s work on the legal side and he totally understands that the PCR is a fraud, but he hasn’t yet figured out that the CPE experiment is more fundamental and attacks both the PCR tests and so-called “vaccines.”

I am trying to work up materials (like a presentation) describing this route by dissecting the paper below, but it takes a lot of work since I am not a biologist. My training is more on the math and physics side of things, which should be useful in studying the genomic sequencing methods which are nothing more than a mathematical algorithms. My hunch is that we can show via mathematical analysis that they are basically oversampling their materials and are hence dreaming up a genomic sequence that can be fit onto any predetermined template. I think we can also show that many of the genetic snippets they are detecting are inherent to the immortalized cell lines themselves since those cells are sequenced along with the patient fluid (i.e., this stuff is mixed together and the mixture is sequenced). My goodness, this stuff is such a mess! If you have any guidance on the sequencing methods, that would be helpful for me since I am starting as a non-specialist in this area. Any critiques or guidance on my approach are also appreciated.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2012-7

Sami
Sami
2 years ago

Hi Jeff

Again appreciate your time and effort to explain things easily in your newsletters.

I want to know you opinion about chickenpox. Is it different than viruses and is it contagious? Since we know people put their kids at a young age with other kids who have it. I’ve heard one opinion that it can be contagious in a way by cells energy ect. Is that a sound view?

Sami
Sami
2 years ago

Thanks Jeff

There has been some research about insect wings having “antibiotic” capabilities as per below articles. This was interesting for me and I’m trying to understand it from a terrain theory perspective, would you be able to give your opinion about what is really going on in these flys?

https://www.imeche.org/news/news-article/insect-wings-bacteria-killing-properties-could-create-better-biomedical-implants

https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2002/10/01/689400.htm

Sami
Sami
2 years ago

Thanks again appreciate your response. Sometimes the folks I’m discussing with show me studies which claim to show transmission of viruses. Below is an example. What is the appropriate way to respond to such claims?

“In one study, nasal washings obtained from jaundiced or “preicteric” people who had received yellow fever vaccine were dropped into the nostrils of 4 healthy male volunteer soldiers, and observations were made weekly [22]. One volunteer developed asymptomatic hyperbilirubinemia, and 2 developed overt jaundice. In another study, 9 male volunteers were injected with pooled blood products obtained from patients who had developed jaundice after receiving injections of mumps convalescent-phase serum or yellow fever inoculation [23]. All subjects developed hepatitis infection with or without jaundice.”

https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/34/7/963/316777

Vincent
Vincent
2 years ago

Hi Jeff, thank you for sharing all your wealth of knowledge! Question, what is your take on antigens? Is it possible that they can be created and possibly “cloaked” to seem like a “virus”? Apologize, I’m walking and learning all this little-by-little…

Vincent
Vincent
2 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Green

thx for explanation!

goldenratio
goldenratio
2 years ago

Can you give us an idea of how perceived contagiousness actually occurs and what might be going on physically? I am totally on board with terrain theory and understand how toxicity, poisoning, and stress are responsible for most of the illness we experience. Having said that, when my young daughter gets sick with the sniffles, it is almost guaranteed that either my wife and/or I will get the sniffles in short order (usually 1-2 days later). This happens enough that I have a hard time chalking this up to statistical happenstance.

My guess is that there is a communication method between our bodies that is invisible to the naked eye. This signal is emanating from our daughter’s body when she is sick and it is effectively telling the bodies of my wife and I that it is time for us to detox too. Hence, we get our colds and do our detox too. Here is another data point: It is well-known that women living in close proximity, such as dorm rooms, tend to have their menstrual cycles synchronize over time. Clearly menstruation isn’t contagious, so there must be a signaling mechanism between these women in such cases. What is it? We also know that pheromones exist and are not visible, but I am not entirely sure what their function is. Another possibility is that our bodies are naturally producing information-rich electromagnetic fields that are perceived by others nearby. Such fields could be produced by electric charges flowing in our bloodstreams as well as in the neuronal activity in our brains.

Taken together, I’m trying to build a list of possible physical mechanisms: this includes pheromones, hormonal/protein excretions (???), electromagnetic fields. What do you think? Is there any published evidence on any of the routes with physical evidence?

goldenratio
goldenratio
2 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Green

I appreciate your patience in replying to me. Apologies if you had to repeat some prior material. I actually bought your book, but have yet to read it since I have a stack of books that I’m trying to work through. There is just so much history and technical material to get caught up on 🙂

Sami
Sami
2 years ago

Hi Jeff

I just read your latest work. Thanks for the info. I always knew in the back of my mind that the argument that viruses can never be isolated is a weak one. Because even if we can isolate these solvents such as exsosomes it doesn’t prove viruses are contagious. The core issue is they are just hijacking the role of the virus to suite their agenda. Is this accurate?

Also, One such example was the claim that these sars covid 2 were identified and a picture with there spike proteins are visible. Big deal…doesn’t prove anything.

They claim that they can show these viruses infect other cells , how are they proving that? Do they have a video showing the movements of these viruses?

Michael
Michael
1 year ago
Reply to  Sami

In reading issue#2 ‘New Alternative Health’ it appears to me Green shares important common ground with his named opponents, Kaufman, Cowen and Lanka – much more so than with Fauci or any virologist he funds. Green’s well reasoned and unnecessarily contentious argument is viruses exist as self-produced soaps which aid in body cleansing/detoxification. Kaufman, Cowen and Lanka take the more hyperbolic stance that viruses don’t exist at all, yet both ‘sides’ agree viruses are not infectious agents, Germ Theory is wrong, and Sars-Cov2/Covid19 wasn’t a pandemic. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. I for one would appreciate a less combative and more collaborative approach aimed to achieve a united front against the primary opponent and their nefarious ‘next one’ contagion plans.

Michael
Michael
1 year ago
Reply to  Jeff Green

They may not admit mistakes, yet they do appear more open-minded than most Doctors in the field, and may readily adopt your line of reason when presented as congruent with their own in the most important ways. To me, whether a virus exists or not is mostly irrelevant to the primary concept the virus is not a causative agent nor is it something one can ‘catch’. Those are the key lessons for the masked masses to avoid complying us all into destruction. At the least, the ‘never isolated’ and ‘not proved to exist’ arguments are eye-openers for further discovery – which is ultimately how I found your work. Much appreciated.

Tom
Tom
2 years ago

Excellent material. The terrain theory makes much more sense than germ theory.

Colton Pugh
Colton Pugh
2 years ago

Hello, Jeff.
I was wondering if you might be able to shed some light on how cancer is formed in the body. I recall either reading, or listening to one of your recordings and can’t find that article or recording again. It was very interesting and I have been trying to explain how cancer works to my girlfriend. You said something about how tumors form around dead tissue or toxic materials that the virus cannot successfully break down and eliminate. I could have this entirely wrong so hopefully you can correct me and maybe even point me in the direction of the point where you mentioned this. Take care, Jeff.
Never stop doing what you do. I think you are the most truthful and accurate voice out there right now and your words are important. Thank you for everything you have done and continue to do.

Catherine
Catherine
1 year ago
Reply to  Jeff Green

Hello Jeff,
I have read the 20 pages of your interview with Alana Fournet in your articles section and found nothing about the function and formation of cancer, except that “Skin cancer is a result of not having enough of a high quality fat layer”???
Could it be somewhere else?
I have been studying this issue for a long time and would be happy to hear your views before sharing mine.
Many thanks for your very stimulating research et reflection.
Catherine, from France

Catherine
Catherine
1 year ago

Hello Jeff,
I have been trying to buy your book The Age of Deception + Shine a Light Journal n°1 and now n°2, without a Paypal account and using my Visa card. In both cases, I could not check out as a guest. When I try to validate after filling in all the necessary fields, the system requests that I open an account which I’d rather not do.
I sent you a mail on May 31st to ask for help…
Many thanks in advance !

87
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x