With the rise of the idea of implementing vaccine passports, we find ourselves entering into dangerous waters of increasing totalitarianism. As this plays itself out, you will find that many so-called ‘experts’ will claim that this is being done to protect public health, whatever that may be. Remembering that ‘public health’ is not a real entity, and that it is made up of individuals whom have the same individual rights under the law—this term ‘public health’ is a misnomer. Nowhere in the Constitution do we read that we must give up our individual rights to protect someone else’s rights, unless they are harming someone else, upsetting the peace, or otherwise. They, of course, will argue that this is all being done to protect the vulnerable and will refer to the above line. But when we put everything in its place, we see that each person has the choice to vaccinate or wear a mask if they so choose, according to their own belief, and can become ‘protected’ as they see fit. The US Constitution is clear in our right to freely travel to and fro without molestation or unreasonable searches and seizures. I do not care whatsoever what the so-called ‘law’ states—I am only concerned with the true law which is stated in the US Constitution—nothing else rendered into so-called law is to be noticed.
NO law whatsoever shall be recognized by any state of the 50 states in the United States of America, or citizens belonging to one of the 50 states of the United States of America, that violates the rights of the citizens stated clearly in the Constitution. Any such law should therefore be ignored if made into law; by the Supreme Court, or by any state legislature within the 50 states, or by Congress, or by executive order of the US President. Such laws are unconstitutional and violate constitutionally guaranteed rights and personal liberty that are upheld in the US Constitution. Thus, a law that would require and mandate bodily harm in order to travel, would infringe upon a number of guarantees in the Bill of Rights, in particular, the Fourth Amendment, which states in part: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…” This includes actions that violate religious liberty and freedom of expression, especially including bodily choice and autonomy. If it is my body, it is my choice, so long as it does not infringe upon anyone else’s freedoms or rights, as stated in the Constitution. Why then is the Left only interested in a person’s rights when it benefits their agenda, and when it does not, are completely opposed to it?
When it comes to such corruption, where does one draw the line, stand up and say “No more!”..? Above all else, we have a Second Amendment, which states the following: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State; the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
We the People must enforce the Constitution, either as both a lawful state militia, or as a single militia of one person. 10 U.S. Code § 246 States – “Militia: composition and classes (a)The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.”
Therefore, we have the right to defend the US Constitution against tyranny, foreign or domestic; within or without. As time progresses, you will continue to see the erosion of the Second Amendment, which will prevent the people from defeating the lawlessness waged by Marxists in government that is to soon come. This accounts for the sudden push to manufacture and promulgate mass events that progress the agenda of world government. Be aware.