Henry Kissinger in 1974 wrote in his report ‘National Security Study Memorandum 200 – Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests’ that reducing the world’s population was paramount to those in power. But when it comes to how they approach this, it becomes quite nefarious. We soon realize that their ideas are not benevolent. Vaccinations are right in line with this agenda. Their approach is to reduce population gradually through tampering and degrading of the food supply, air, and water, and herding people into the medical institutions, ultimately creating a weakened race.
This is why raw foods are attacked and blamed for disease, because those in power know that they prevent disease and strengthen the population. A strong people can overthrow a corrupt government. This is why throughout history, slaves have been fed rice and the kings dined on meat and fruits of all types.
If we look at their own documentation, we learn a great deal. For instance, in the ‘Event 201’ pandemic exercise hosted by John Hopkins University, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation on Friday, October 18, 2019, we see a very similar plan to conduct exactly what is taking place now. https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/scenario.html
All there needs to be is the illusion of a pandemic—that people are dying all around you. The media then confirms this and plants the seed and watches it take root and blossom. There need not be actual coronavirus cases even. They may label them as coronavirus cases, when in actuality, they have designed a fraudulent test that looks for fragments of genetic material shared between most viruses. So then, the case may be flu, or some other virus. This allows statistical manipulation.
Also, if we read the Rockefellar Foundation’s ‘Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development’ https://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/RockefellerFoundation.pdf, we can see that these scenarios have been prepared long in advance in order for them to capitalize on their agenda, which is a one world totalitarian government. This is spelled out on page 18 of the report—
“At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.”