Why Viruses Happen Annually & How Viruses Dissolve

Written by Jeff Green
Alternative Nutrition/Researcher
October 4th, 2020

Viewer question: Jeff, why do common colds/flu occur annually? And is it true that the vaccinated person will experience it his entire life, compared to an unvaccinated person? 

This happens yearly because the body, on a cyclical basis, is signaled to dump mass stored toxins. This occurs at the cellular level. Climate/seasonal changes bring about humidity and temperature changes which increase bioactive functions of cells, through moisture and/or oxygen absorption. These biochemical signals cause cells to release stored toxins—it is cellular processes being maintained through cell survival mechanisms; a sort of house cleaning. Bacterium also increases during colder months, as they flourish in the blood due to a lowered bodily temperature. When they proliferate, they feed upon debris in the tissue and blood. 

When they consume such matter, they excrete it into a utilizable form for white blood cells and other cleansing cells, such as phagocytes, to further eliminate and or recycle for use by the body. The body discards 90% of toxins through the skin. The rest expel via the bowels, mouth, and mucus membranes. Depending upon the toxicity and nature of those substances, parasites or fungus may be utilized to help break them down. But when substances are too toxic for these living microbial agents to consume without dying, a non-living agent must be created by the body as a last resort. These are called viruses; enzymatic-like agents that break apart specific matter. They dissolve waste matter when tissue is too toxic for our living microbes to consume and eliminate. 

Viruses are embedded in the core with mRNA and DNA, which is a biochemical lock-and-key system for communication purposes with white blood cells and tissue. Their outer covering is made of a protein coating; the capsid—which is a moisture coat that can engulf specific tissue through surfactant action. Surfactants are molecules that bond with each other to form sealed bubbles. This process is carried out with the guidance of white blood cell antibodies. This coating acts as a type of magnet, repelling and/or attracting matter to and from. Once the matter is engulfed through the surfactant nature of the outer coating, the virus will gradually dissolve/disassemble that matter like a soap would break down grease from dishes. Antibodies will bring matter to the virus as well. Both agents work together as a unit. Since viruses are not alive, they must have a guiding agent, thus, antibodies are utilized—viruses cannot fly or walk, and have no survival mechanisms. Antibodies are always used as facilitators of healing, which is a part of the infection process. If this were not so, we would witness every single person dying from mass cell infection 100% of the time; being non-discriminatory, yet, we do not observe this. Once the virus has broken down the matter and neutralized it, the body will expel it via the aforementioned routes.

Colds are mainly bacterial, but sometimes viruses may be used; cold virus. Remember that each virus created by each cell will contain differing RNA and DNA because each cell in the human body contains minutely different DNA. Science has claimed in the past that each cell contains the same DNA—this is false, and studies now show that each cell contains different DNA. This is one reason why viruses can never be contagious—the lock-and-key system known as RNA/DNA would not be compatible between hosts.

We may observe the Illusion of Viral Activity, because all living organisms—be they plants, or animals—function with biological clocks alongside nature. When trees blossom, it is because temperature and climatic changes are causing that tree to produce fruit. In the microlevel of the body, the same is true. The body is the microcosm of the outer macrocosm (universe) we observe. 

A person may experience viral or bacterial detoxifications regularly if they continually toxify their body. Even in healthy people, we can expect to have mild colds every so often. Bacterial colds are necessary to help us break down toxins we may have picked up from air, food, or water sources. They also serve to strengthen the overall body. 

Vaccinated individuals may not experience proper detoxifications because vaccines hinder the body from cleansing and reforming properly. This is because the body shifts all it’s resources over into trying to lower the radical immune response due to adjuvants, tissues, and chemicals in vaccines, that it has no time to detoxify and strengthen the rest of the body. Such people are more prone to developing viruses to help them break down such toxicity.

23 Responses

  1. Hello Jeff,

    I have been very suspicious about all of the Covid fuss and do not believe what our health authorities are telling us here in Canada.

    I very rarely get sick; however, last year in May, I picked up three workers that returned to Canada from China.
    All three had been sick with a flue for about 2 weeks. I was in the car with them for ~ 2 hours. All three were coughing and hacking all the way home.

    The next day I developed a sore throat and went through the typical flue symtoms for 3 – 4 day. I was back to normal in 1 week.

    In your opinion what do you think were the mechanisms that made me sick ?


    1. Your situation sounds like a case of coincidence, as is often observed with viruses. I have observed the opposite. I have been in the presence of those that were sick with flu or cold and never developed it. I have seen the exact same historical documented observations.

      Here is one example:

      “Perhaps the most interesting epidemiological studies conducted during the 1918–1919 pandemic were the human experiments conducted by the Public Health Service and the U.S. Navy under the supervision of Milton Rosenau on Gallops Island, the quarantine station in Boston Harbor, and on Angel Island, its counterpart in San Francisco. The experiment began with 100 volunteers from the Navy who had no history of influenza. Rosenau was the first to report on the experiments conducted at Gallops Island in November and December 1918.69 His first volunteers received first one strain and then several strains of Pfeiffer’s bacillus by spray and swab into their noses and throats and then into their eyes. When that procedure failed to produce disease, others were inoculated with mixtures of other organisms isolated from the throats and noses of influenza patients. Next, some volunteers received injections of blood from influenza patients.
      Finally, 13 of the volunteers were taken into an influenza ward and exposed to 10 influenza patients each. Each volunteer was to shake hands with each patient, to talk with him at close range, and to permit him to cough directly into his face. None of the volunteers in these experiments developed influenza. Rosenau was clearly puzzled, and he cautioned against drawing conclusions from negative results. He ended his article in JAMA with a telling acknowledgment: “We entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person. Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”69 (p. 313) The research conducted at Angel Island and that continued in early 1919 in Boston broadened this research by inoculating with the Mathers streptococcus and by including a search for filter-passing agents, but it produced similar negative results.70–72 It seemed that what was acknowledged to be one of the most contagious of communicable diseases could not be transferred under experimental conditions.”

      Also, consider the following:

      It could have been possible that their coughing was releasing toxins into the air which you breathed and it irritated your body. Viruses were not transmitted, but toxins expelled from the lungs can cause temporary sickness in another individual.

      1. But it is appearing that people are passing sickness on to other people though. I’ve heard multiple accounts where one person became ill and then other members in the family became ill and died. I heard of a caretaker who continued to take care of 2 elderly people who tested positive for covid, and then she ended up getting sick and dying. I recently was told that one person, who is a Navajo indian, lost 35 people in her family, supposedly to covid. I believe she did not make this up. She was ok, and she credits that to social distancing from them and masks, of course. Now, I find it hard to believe that all 35 of those people were vaccinated or exposed to 5G or were extremely toxic and close to dying anyway. So how would this be explained? And could it be proven?

        If someone was vaccinated, and gets very sick and their body starts to clear that. If they were to cough and sneeze into someone and the waste products and viruses entered that person’s body, then how sick could they get? Would they get as sick as the person who was vaccinated? Could they die just from the toxins that the other person is eliminating?

        1. Hi Evan. Okay, to begin, you’re starting off with quite a big misunderstanding about how all of this functions. I have addressed every single question you have in my writings.

          Start here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtWYQS3LFlE
          Also, read the comment section of this video for much more detail about your questions.

          I have addressed 5G here: https://virusesarenotcontagious.com/shine-a-light-newsletter-issue-1-10-06-2020/

          I have addressed viral functions (partially), and The Illusion of Viral Activity (pertaining to your question about supposed ‘contagiousness’) here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1C6SGlzdYG4fZ7o0CkcHHecOA4EWmhePH/view

          I explain the rest in my book, which is available on my website. And the comment section below the article you are replying to has answered your question:

          “If they were to cough and sneeze into someone and the waste products and viruses entered that person’s body, then how sick could they get?”

          “…as with anything coming from outside the body that is foreign and toxic, it has the potential to then cause toxic conditions. That is not to say that you are being infected with something—you’re not. Infection is completely twisted in modern medicine; Naturally occurring bacteria and viruses in the body do not ‘infect’. They are a result of infection caused from foreign debris, toxic substances, and decaying tissue in the body.”

  2. Good evening Jeff, sorry for my poor english. My question is: once the virus has broken down the toxic matter and eliminated it via the mentioned routes , what remains of it? what happens to it? Is it expelled together with the toxins? Thank you for all🙏

    1. Thanks for the question. Viruses occur after cleansing cells, bacteria, parasites, or fungus have consumed and discarded waste matter. When those agents are then poisoned to death due to their consumption of toxic matter, viruses are manufactured by cells when cellular survival is threatened. The virus will dissolve leftover debris from the previous processes. Viruses will then dissolve the remaining toxic substances and toxic tissues that the other processes could not. Once a virus dissolves a substance, it is then expelled by white blood cells from the skin, mucus, or bowels. Viruses, with the help of antibodies (white blood cells), facilitate the process of expulsion of toxins. Viruses break down and disassemble matter into minuscule simple particle structures that are more easily dealt with by the bodily system, allowing the body to neutralize them by binding with neutralizing minerals, such as calcium and magnesium. The virus breaks down and falls apart afterward; dissolution. Those substances, now neutralized through the immune and viral processes, are able to be removed by healthy cells and cleaned up, then expelled via the aforementioned routes, which leads to symptoms such as coughing, sneezing, heavy mucus (which are white blood cells that form into solvent gels that bind with toxins to escort them from the body safely—being housed and basically neutralized in the mucus), and fever, which reduces bacterial levels, and initiates the last stage in the healing phase.


      1. Yes, as with anything coming from outside the body that is foreign and toxic, it has the potential to then cause toxic conditions. That is not to say that you are being infected with something—you’re not. Infection is completely twisted in modern medicine; Naturally occurring bacteria and viruses in the body do not ‘infect’. They are a result of infection caused from foreign debris, toxic substances, and decaying tissue in the body.

        1. Sera Jeff, I wrote earlier to you but my message got lost. I have a couple of questions: is it then useful in order to prevent or as a more correct therapy to take,( since they are considered detox agents,) consistent amount of vitaminC, vitaminD3, zinc, echinacea ect. to “help” viruses in implementing their detoxification task? If masks are not effective or even armful, could they play a role in preventing intoxication? Thanks🙏

          1. It depends upon the type of supplements a person would be taking. If they are synthetic or dried forms, then no. If they are from raw fruits, then yes. Only raw fruits will truly help give enzymes and nutrients to feed the body’s processes without causing toxic accumulations from unutilizable supplements. Those nutrients will help facilitate the bodily processes more easily, of course. It is widespread toxicity that causes possible white blood cell imbalances and death—not the virus itself. Cells are merely trying to survive by making viruses.

  3. Thank you Jeff for your precious answer. In reading and listening to you it appears obvious that for example the “conventional “ therapies applied in trying to cure the covid19 are wrong. Would it be correct to say that taking consistent doses of vitaminC, zinc, vitaminD3, echinacea and so on is much more effective because being detoxifying substances they are going to help the virus in getting rid of toxic matter, especially for persons with debilitated immune system? Is it the overreaction of the viruses not controlled properly by white cells that can lead ti death?

  4. Hi Jeff. I am very interested in learning more about the virus process. Do you have any literature you could recommend on the subject? Most searches just churn out the MSM version of viruses. Without being able to do the research myself how would one go about finding the truth on a subject?

    1. Absolutely, I will provide a few sources.

      The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts About Vaccination, by Eleanor McBean M.D., N.D., 1956 (polio and other viruses)
      Swine Flu Expose, by Eleanora I. McBean, Ph.D., N.D., 1977
      Vaccination a Delusion, Its Penal Enforcement a Crime by Alfred Russel Wallace, 1898 (smallpox)
      Writings and lectures by Stefan Lanka on viruses

      There are many more, but this is a good place to start.

  5. This post is somewhat repetitive. Just trying to get my point across! Viruses have no form or shape & no amount of magic (as in CGI or other images created by artists) or science can cause them to go from liquid to a little round spiky creature that looks like a landmine. Viruses are very bad liquids – including the liquids in VACCINES – no matter the source. Just bc idiot scientists change the definition of a word does not make the original meaning null & void, nor does it give credibility to the new meaning. A NON-LIVING liquid can’t change into a fully living or barely living being under ANY circumstances. No magic or science exists that brings liquids to life. Just bc of the current belief of what a virus is, we’re gonna continue to suffer the consequences of money-grubbing, power hungry dictators keeping us under lockdown, a PRISON term.
    As long as the population as a whole believes the lying narrative of MSM/mainstream science, we will continue to suffer the consequences of power/money hungry dictators. https://www.etymonline.com/word/virus Examples of viruses: https://www.thoughtco.com/toxic-chemical-definition-609284. Vaccines are also viruses bc they contain harmful particles. I don’t know if the liquid itself is harmful.

    1. I understand what you’re saying. Viruses themselves are not necessarily bad. By themselves, they are inert. It is how they are used by the immune system that matters. Viruses are an expression of cells attempting to survive. The liquid in vaccines is worse than the viral tissue itself, although even without those chemical stabilizers, vaccines are still dangerous due to their very nature. The mere act of injecting foreign debris into the body will elicit the creation of antibodies, and they claim this is creating immunity—it’s not. Antibodies do not create immunity. Antibodies arrive at the scene to control infection and have multiple roles in toxin excretion. If I cut myself, antibodies appear. Does that mean if I cut myself again, I will not bleed? No. I am not then immune to damage from external insults. That’s basically what they claim with viruses, and it is absurd and illogical, and simply not true.

  6. Hi I’m sorry if this is repetitive, I can’t find the answer to this specifically. At my children’s school, about 5 families did not vaccinate their children. A child came back from a holiday abroad with measles and went back to school when he had started having mild symptoms. They took him out once the symptoms worsened and measles was diagnosed. Over the next couple of weeks, all the children who were unvaccinated (including mine) became ill with measles but no one else. Could you explain what happened in this case? Thanks

        1. Ok, like I wrote in another comment here:

          I hear that from people all the time. They tell me, “But my son got sick, and then the rest of us got sick!” They fail to understand the way the body works. I have observed the exact opposite. I have been in the presence of a sick person, with cold or flu, and have never gotten sick. And I have talked to many people that say the same thing. People are observing the ‘Illusion of Viral Activity’. First, we must understand that illness is not spread. So then, if we suppose it is passed on, then one child must have manifested the illness first without being in contact with any other sick person because not everyone is sick all the time.

          What is happening is that in any given area of the world, people in those areas will have similar detoxification periods wherein toxins dump into the blood for removal. It is very common for people to begin observing this illusion. In reality, it is no different than bears coming out of hibernation, or trees blossoming at the same times—Most do not all come out on the same day, but they gradually do so one after the other. There are a number of things that can set off these detoxifications. I have observed weather changes bring them about, as well as temperature changes.

          It is very common for people to observe this illusion and believe it is contagious—that is the nature of mankind; they’re easily self-deceived by coincidences. Health is rife with such misobservations because it cannot be directly seen. Therefore, the answer is not obvious at first and is a complex puzzle for those that do not understand the nature of the body. In reality, it is no different than bears coming out of hibernation, or trees blossoming at the same times—Most do not all come out on the same day, but they gradually do so one after the other.

          1. OK but part of my point is that only the unvaccinated children got ill. So why did the other children not get ill? It was so clearly delineated. The unvaccinated children got measles, the vaccinated children didn’t. If viruses are not contagious and vaccines thereby rendered pointless can you explain this? I am just trying to understand this new paradigm of illness, not disprove it. I just don’t quite get it yet….

          2. I would have to have seen such an occurrence first-hand, in all honestly, because there are too many coincidences, and the timeline is unknown (at least to me). But I can offer one more bit of information that may answer your question:

            Measles, like chickenpox, is a childhood detoxification that involves strengthening of the nervous system at an early age, and it must be allowed to run its course or forgo the body’s development. Vaccination prevents these detoxifications, and/or stales them for a time from occurring. They are delayed due to the body spending large amounts of energy on cleansing foreign debris and tissue from the body due to vaccine toxicity. This means the detoxification will occur at a later point in the child’s life, most likely as an adult, where the detoxification will be much stronger. Booster shots help prolong this detoxfication by foregoing immune system development. But sometimes, the body acts anyway, and the detoxification process occurs.

            And do remember that the body is on a cycle, so as I said in my last comment, viruses will manifest in many people all at once, just as many trees bloom all at once. Likewise, the body behaves in a similar fashion. If those children had vaccines, they would not detoxify and develop viruses properly. Just like someone on antibiotics will not develop bacterial detoxification properly, because antibiotics kill bacteria. Therefore, detoxifications can be halted through external insults, such as vaccination, and detoxifications can be delayed for many years at the expense of disease manifestation due to improper system formation.

  7. Thank you. That helps understand it more. It’s so interesting and also quite hard to shift from our usual way of understanding disease to this new way. Is the new way theoretical at this point or are there studies that back up these ideas?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *