Why Viruses Happen Annually & How Viruses Dissolve

Written by Jeff Green
Alternative Nutrition/Researcher
October 4th, 2020

Viewer question: Jeff, why do common colds/flu occur annually? And is it true that the vaccinated person will experience it his entire life, compared to an unvaccinated person? 


This happens yearly because the body, on a cyclical basis, is signaled to dump mass stored toxins. This occurs at the cellular level. Climate/seasonal changes bring about humidity and temperature changes which increase bioactive functions of cells, through moisture and/or oxygen absorption. These biochemical signals cause cells to release stored toxins—it is cellular processes being maintained through cell survival mechanisms; a sort of house cleaning. Bacterium also increases during colder months, as they flourish in the blood due to a lowered bodily temperature. When they proliferate, they feed upon debris in the tissue and blood. 

When they consume such matter, they excrete it into a utilizable form for white blood cells and other cleansing cells, such as phagocytes, to further eliminate and or recycle for use by the body. The body discards 90% of toxins through the skin. The rest expel via the bowels, mouth, and mucus membranes. Depending upon the toxicity and nature of those substances, parasites or fungus may be utilized to help break them down. But when substances are too toxic for these living microbial agents to consume without dying, a non-living agent must be created by the body as a last resort. These are called viruses; enzymatic-like agents that break apart specific matter. They dissolve waste matter when tissue is too toxic for our living microbes to consume and eliminate. 

Viruses are embedded in the core with mRNA and DNA, which is a biochemical lock-and-key system for communication purposes with white blood cells and tissue. Their outer covering is made of a protein coating; the capsid—which is a moisture coat that can engulf specific tissue through surfactant action. Surfactants are molecules that bond with each other to form sealed bubbles. This process is carried out with the guidance of white blood cell antibodies. This coating acts as a type of magnet, repelling and/or attracting matter to and from. Once the matter is engulfed through the surfactant nature of the outer coating, the virus will gradually dissolve/disassemble that matter like a soap would break down grease from dishes. Antibodies will bring matter to the virus as well. Both agents work together as a unit. Since viruses are not alive, they must have a guiding agent, thus, antibodies are utilized—viruses cannot fly or walk, and have no survival mechanisms. Antibodies are always used as facilitators of healing, which is a part of the infection process. If this were not so, we would witness every single person dying from mass cell infection 100% of the time; being non-discriminatory, yet, we do not observe this. Once the virus has broken down the matter and neutralized it, the body will expel it via the aforementioned routes.

Colds are mainly bacterial, but sometimes viruses may be used; cold virus. Remember that each virus created by each cell will contain differing RNA and DNA because each cell in the human body contains minutely different DNA. Science has claimed in the past that each cell contains the same DNA—this is false, and studies now show that each cell contains different DNA. This is one reason why viruses can never be contagious—the lock-and-key system known as RNA/DNA would not be compatible between hosts.

We may observe the Illusion of Viral Activity, because all living organisms—be they plants, or animals—function with biological clocks alongside nature. When trees blossom, it is because temperature and climatic changes are causing that tree to produce fruit. In the microlevel of the body, the same is true. The body is the microcosm of the outer macrocosm (universe) we observe. 

A person may experience viral or bacterial detoxifications regularly if they continually toxify their body. Even in healthy people, we can expect to have mild colds every so often. Bacterial colds are necessary to help us break down toxins we may have picked up from air, food, or water sources. They also serve to strengthen the overall body. 

Vaccinated individuals may not experience proper detoxifications because vaccines hinder the body from cleansing and reforming properly. This is because the body shifts all it’s resources over into trying to lower the radical immune response due to adjuvants, tissues, and chemicals in vaccines, that it has no time to detoxify and strengthen the rest of the body. Such people are more prone to developing viruses to help them break down such toxicity.

36 Responses

  1. Hello Jeff,

    I have been very suspicious about all of the Covid fuss and do not believe what our health authorities are telling us here in Canada.

    I very rarely get sick; however, last year in May, I picked up three workers that returned to Canada from China.
    All three had been sick with a flue for about 2 weeks. I was in the car with them for ~ 2 hours. All three were coughing and hacking all the way home.

    The next day I developed a sore throat and went through the typical flue symtoms for 3 – 4 day. I was back to normal in 1 week.

    In your opinion what do you think were the mechanisms that made me sick ?

    Cheers,
    Heinz

    1. Your situation sounds like a case of coincidence, as is often observed with viruses. I have observed the opposite. I have been in the presence of those that were sick with flu or cold and never developed it. I have seen the exact same historical documented observations.

      Here is one example:

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/
      “Perhaps the most interesting epidemiological studies conducted during the 1918–1919 pandemic were the human experiments conducted by the Public Health Service and the U.S. Navy under the supervision of Milton Rosenau on Gallops Island, the quarantine station in Boston Harbor, and on Angel Island, its counterpart in San Francisco. The experiment began with 100 volunteers from the Navy who had no history of influenza. Rosenau was the first to report on the experiments conducted at Gallops Island in November and December 1918.69 His first volunteers received first one strain and then several strains of Pfeiffer’s bacillus by spray and swab into their noses and throats and then into their eyes. When that procedure failed to produce disease, others were inoculated with mixtures of other organisms isolated from the throats and noses of influenza patients. Next, some volunteers received injections of blood from influenza patients.
      Finally, 13 of the volunteers were taken into an influenza ward and exposed to 10 influenza patients each. Each volunteer was to shake hands with each patient, to talk with him at close range, and to permit him to cough directly into his face. None of the volunteers in these experiments developed influenza. Rosenau was clearly puzzled, and he cautioned against drawing conclusions from negative results. He ended his article in JAMA with a telling acknowledgment: “We entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person. Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”69 (p. 313) The research conducted at Angel Island and that continued in early 1919 in Boston broadened this research by inoculating with the Mathers streptococcus and by including a search for filter-passing agents, but it produced similar negative results.70–72 It seemed that what was acknowledged to be one of the most contagious of communicable diseases could not be transferred under experimental conditions.”

      Also, consider the following:

      It could have been possible that their coughing was releasing toxins into the air which you breathed and it irritated your body. Viruses were not transmitted, but toxins expelled from the lungs can cause temporary sickness in another individual.

      1. But it is appearing that people are passing sickness on to other people though. I’ve heard multiple accounts where one person became ill and then other members in the family became ill and died. I heard of a caretaker who continued to take care of 2 elderly people who tested positive for covid, and then she ended up getting sick and dying. I recently was told that one person, who is a Navajo indian, lost 35 people in her family, supposedly to covid. I believe she did not make this up. She was ok, and she credits that to social distancing from them and masks, of course. Now, I find it hard to believe that all 35 of those people were vaccinated or exposed to 5G or were extremely toxic and close to dying anyway. So how would this be explained? And could it be proven?

        If someone was vaccinated, and gets very sick and their body starts to clear that. If they were to cough and sneeze into someone and the waste products and viruses entered that person’s body, then how sick could they get? Would they get as sick as the person who was vaccinated? Could they die just from the toxins that the other person is eliminating?

        1. Hi Evan. Okay, to begin, you’re starting off with quite a big misunderstanding about how all of this functions. I have addressed every single question you have in my writings.

          Start here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtWYQS3LFlE
          Also, read the comment section of this video for much more detail about your questions.

          I have addressed 5G here: https://virusesarenotcontagious.com/shine-a-light-newsletter-issue-1-10-06-2020/

          I have addressed viral functions (partially), and The Illusion of Viral Activity (pertaining to your question about supposed ‘contagiousness’) here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1C6SGlzdYG4fZ7o0CkcHHecOA4EWmhePH/view

          I explain the rest in my book, which is available on my website. And the comment section below the article you are replying to has answered your question:

          “If they were to cough and sneeze into someone and the waste products and viruses entered that person’s body, then how sick could they get?”

          “…as with anything coming from outside the body that is foreign and toxic, it has the potential to then cause toxic conditions. That is not to say that you are being infected with something—you’re not. Infection is completely twisted in modern medicine; Naturally occurring bacteria and viruses in the body do not ‘infect’. They are a result of infection caused from foreign debris, toxic substances, and decaying tissue in the body.”

          1. For statistical manipulation, read the book — ‘Vaccination a Delusion: Its Penal Enforcement a Crime’ by Alfred Russel Wallace, 1898. In it, he shows how smallpox was statistically manipulated in nefarious ways and documents it heavily with proof. Now, the actual cause of smallpox is due to advanced poisonings. Smallpox can be fostered and brought about by vaccines and their toxicity. The body discards the majority of poisons through the skin, therefore eruptions on the skin from poisoning are common. Toxins lacerate skin tissue and cause blisters, sores, and rashes of all kinds. Smallpox is an ancient disease and can be brought about by many factors, such as vaccination, metal toxicity, severe nutritional deficiencies, and so on. Sanitation with regard to bacteria and viruses play no role. Instead, clean water, sanitation that keeps air clean and pure, and adopting good diet practices wherein one is not eating out of lead vessels or using toxic metal utensils, is what prevents extreme toxicity such as smallpox.

            When it comes to events throughout history, a good example is the Indian smallpox case. Native American Indians were wiped out due to the destruction of their food supply, and the poisoning of their waters. This, in turn, caused diseases like smallpox. For example, smallpox symptoms are from severe poisoning of the body. Both measles and smallpox are skin eruptions wherein toxins expel through the skin. Smallpox is more extended and severe. To make matters much worse, smallpox vaccines were offered as a solution, when in fact, it perpetuated this poisoning further and further, causing many deaths. Smallpox is an ancient disease that occurs in toxic bodies as an expression of toxicity. It can be hastened and brought about by environmental pollution.

            There are those that also claim the Indians were infected via blankets, however, historian Philip Ranlet of Hunter College and author of a 2000 article on the smallpox blanket incident in Pennsylvania History: A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies, also casts doubt. “There is no evidence that the scheme worked,” Ranlet says.

            Historians usually attribute most of the deaths to the spread of diseases for which native people had no immunity, but recently historian Andrés Reséndez has pushed back against this, arguing that populations were lower than previously estimated, and “a nexus of slavery, overwork and famine killed more Indians in the Caribbean than smallpox, influenza and malaria.” I stand by this and assert that Native Indian’s natural raw food supply was killed off, their waters poisoned, their diets changed, and were turned into slaves, leading to diseases of all kinds to try to balance the toxic effects of toxic food, lack of proper nutrition, and stress on their bodies.

            “In spite of the disease breeding conditions of India’s cities with inadequate sanitation, nutrition and housing facilities and the polluted water, lack of sewers, extreme heat, etc., the smallpox death rate is far lower than that of completely vaccinated Mexico.” — The Poisoned Needle by Eleanor Mcbean, 1957. See

            The Pasteur Institute of India developed influenza vaccine in 1957 and a BPL inactivated rabies vaccine in 1970. This institute developed and produced, for the first time in India, indigenous trivalent oral polio vaccine (OPV) in 1970. So, there was a lot of vaccination going on prior to the 1974 outbreak of smallpox—ample time for toxicity to accumulate in a large swath of the population. Now, what you must understand is that all throughout history, vaccines have taken credit for the disappearance of disease. In fact, it perpetuated the diseases they claimed to prevent. Smallpox and polio are two diseases that can crop up in populations periodically due to toxicity accumulations from many sources of environmental pollution. For example, large outbreaks of polio tend to come about every 150 years. It takes this long for the spine to build up in a generation (100 years).

            —Jeff

  2. Good evening Jeff, sorry for my poor english. My question is: once the virus has broken down the toxic matter and eliminated it via the mentioned routes , what remains of it? what happens to it? Is it expelled together with the toxins? Thank you for all🙏

    1. Thanks for the question. Viruses occur after cleansing cells, bacteria, parasites, or fungus have consumed and discarded waste matter. When those agents are then poisoned to death due to their consumption of toxic matter, viruses are manufactured by cells when cellular survival is threatened. The virus will dissolve leftover debris from the previous processes. Viruses will then dissolve the remaining toxic substances and toxic tissues that the other processes could not. Once a virus dissolves a substance, it is then expelled by white blood cells from the skin, mucus, or bowels. Viruses, with the help of antibodies (white blood cells), facilitate the process of expulsion of toxins. Viruses break down and disassemble matter into minuscule simple particle structures that are more easily dealt with by the bodily system, allowing the body to neutralize them by binding with neutralizing minerals, such as calcium and magnesium. The virus breaks down and falls apart afterward; dissolution. Those substances, now neutralized through the immune and viral processes, are able to be removed by healthy cells and cleaned up, then expelled via the aforementioned routes, which leads to symptoms such as coughing, sneezing, heavy mucus (which are white blood cells that form into solvent gels that bind with toxins to escort them from the body safely—being housed and basically neutralized in the mucus), and fever, which reduces bacterial levels, and initiates the last stage in the healing phase.

      —Jeff

    2. Thank you Jeff . So, we can say that we can be contaminated by the expelled toxic matter but not infected?!

      1. Yes, as with anything coming from outside the body that is foreign and toxic, it has the potential to then cause toxic conditions. That is not to say that you are being infected with something—you’re not. Infection is completely twisted in modern medicine; Naturally occurring bacteria and viruses in the body do not ‘infect’. They are a result of infection caused from foreign debris, toxic substances, and decaying tissue in the body.

        1. Sera Jeff, I wrote earlier to you but my message got lost. I have a couple of questions: is it then useful in order to prevent or as a more correct therapy to take,( since they are considered detox agents,) consistent amount of vitaminC, vitaminD3, zinc, echinacea ect. to “help” viruses in implementing their detoxification task? If masks are not effective or even armful, could they play a role in preventing intoxication? Thanks🙏

          1. It depends upon the type of supplements a person would be taking. If they are synthetic or dried forms, then no. If they are from raw fruits, then yes. Only raw fruits will truly help give enzymes and nutrients to feed the body’s processes without causing toxic accumulations from unutilizable supplements. Those nutrients will help facilitate the bodily processes more easily, of course. It is widespread toxicity that causes possible white blood cell imbalances and death—not the virus itself. Cells are merely trying to survive by making viruses.

  3. Thank you Jeff for your precious answer. In reading and listening to you it appears obvious that for example the “conventional “ therapies applied in trying to cure the covid19 are wrong. Would it be correct to say that taking consistent doses of vitaminC, zinc, vitaminD3, echinacea and so on is much more effective because being detoxifying substances they are going to help the virus in getting rid of toxic matter, especially for persons with debilitated immune system? Is it the overreaction of the viruses not controlled properly by white cells that can lead ti death?

  4. Hi Jeff. I am very interested in learning more about the virus process. Do you have any literature you could recommend on the subject? Most searches just churn out the MSM version of viruses. Without being able to do the research myself how would one go about finding the truth on a subject?

    1. Absolutely, I will provide a few sources.

      The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts About Vaccination, by Eleanor McBean M.D., N.D., 1956 (polio and other viruses)
      Swine Flu Expose, by Eleanora I. McBean, Ph.D., N.D., 1977
      Vaccination a Delusion, Its Penal Enforcement a Crime by Alfred Russel Wallace, 1898 (smallpox)
      Writings and lectures by Stefan Lanka on viruses

      There are many more, but this is a good place to start.

  5. This post is somewhat repetitive. Just trying to get my point across! Viruses have no form or shape & no amount of magic (as in CGI or other images created by artists) or science can cause them to go from liquid to a little round spiky creature that looks like a landmine. Viruses are very bad liquids – including the liquids in VACCINES – no matter the source. Just bc idiot scientists change the definition of a word does not make the original meaning null & void, nor does it give credibility to the new meaning. A NON-LIVING liquid can’t change into a fully living or barely living being under ANY circumstances. No magic or science exists that brings liquids to life. Just bc of the current belief of what a virus is, we’re gonna continue to suffer the consequences of money-grubbing, power hungry dictators keeping us under lockdown, a PRISON term.
    As long as the population as a whole believes the lying narrative of MSM/mainstream science, we will continue to suffer the consequences of power/money hungry dictators. https://www.etymonline.com/word/virus Examples of viruses: https://www.thoughtco.com/toxic-chemical-definition-609284. Vaccines are also viruses bc they contain harmful particles. I don’t know if the liquid itself is harmful.

    1. I understand what you’re saying. Viruses themselves are not necessarily bad. By themselves, they are inert. It is how they are used by the immune system that matters. Viruses are an expression of cells attempting to survive. The liquid in vaccines is worse than the viral tissue itself, although even without those chemical stabilizers, vaccines are still dangerous due to their very nature. The mere act of injecting foreign debris into the body will elicit the creation of antibodies, and they claim this is creating immunity—it’s not. Antibodies do not create immunity. Antibodies arrive at the scene to control infection and have multiple roles in toxin excretion. If I cut myself, antibodies appear. Does that mean if I cut myself again, I will not bleed? No. I am not then immune to damage from external insults. That’s basically what they claim with viruses, and it is absurd and illogical, and simply not true.

  6. Hi I’m sorry if this is repetitive, I can’t find the answer to this specifically. At my children’s school, about 5 families did not vaccinate their children. A child came back from a holiday abroad with measles and went back to school when he had started having mild symptoms. They took him out once the symptoms worsened and measles was diagnosed. Over the next couple of weeks, all the children who were unvaccinated (including mine) became ill with measles but no one else. Could you explain what happened in this case? Thanks

        1. Ok, like I wrote in another comment here:

          I hear that from people all the time. They tell me, “But my son got sick, and then the rest of us got sick!” They fail to understand the way the body works. I have observed the exact opposite. I have been in the presence of a sick person, with cold or flu, and have never gotten sick. And I have talked to many people that say the same thing. People are observing the ‘Illusion of Viral Activity’. First, we must understand that illness is not spread. So then, if we suppose it is passed on, then one child must have manifested the illness first without being in contact with any other sick person because not everyone is sick all the time.

          What is happening is that in any given area of the world, people in those areas will have similar detoxification periods wherein toxins dump into the blood for removal. It is very common for people to begin observing this illusion. In reality, it is no different than bears coming out of hibernation, or trees blossoming at the same times—Most do not all come out on the same day, but they gradually do so one after the other. There are a number of things that can set off these detoxifications. I have observed weather changes bring them about, as well as temperature changes.

          It is very common for people to observe this illusion and believe it is contagious—that is the nature of mankind; they’re easily self-deceived by coincidences. Health is rife with such misobservations because it cannot be directly seen. Therefore, the answer is not obvious at first and is a complex puzzle for those that do not understand the nature of the body. In reality, it is no different than bears coming out of hibernation, or trees blossoming at the same times—Most do not all come out on the same day, but they gradually do so one after the other.

          1. OK but part of my point is that only the unvaccinated children got ill. So why did the other children not get ill? It was so clearly delineated. The unvaccinated children got measles, the vaccinated children didn’t. If viruses are not contagious and vaccines thereby rendered pointless can you explain this? I am just trying to understand this new paradigm of illness, not disprove it. I just don’t quite get it yet….

          2. I would have to have seen such an occurrence first-hand, in all honestly, because there are too many coincidences, and the timeline is unknown (at least to me). But I can offer one more bit of information that may answer your question:

            Measles, like chickenpox, is a childhood detoxification that involves strengthening of the nervous system at an early age, and it must be allowed to run its course or forgo the body’s development. Vaccination prevents these detoxifications, and/or stales them for a time from occurring. They are delayed due to the body spending large amounts of energy on cleansing foreign debris and tissue from the body due to vaccine toxicity. This means the detoxification will occur at a later point in the child’s life, most likely as an adult, where the detoxification will be much stronger. Booster shots help prolong this detoxfication by foregoing immune system development. But sometimes, the body acts anyway, and the detoxification process occurs.

            And do remember that the body is on a cycle, so as I said in my last comment, viruses will manifest in many people all at once, just as many trees bloom all at once. Likewise, the body behaves in a similar fashion. If those children had vaccines, they would not detoxify and develop viruses properly. Just like someone on antibiotics will not develop bacterial detoxification properly, because antibiotics kill bacteria. Therefore, detoxifications can be halted through external insults, such as vaccination, and detoxifications can be delayed for many years at the expense of disease manifestation due to improper system formation.

  7. Thank you. That helps understand it more. It’s so interesting and also quite hard to shift from our usual way of understanding disease to this new way. Is the new way theoretical at this point or are there studies that back up these ideas?

  8. Hi Jeff,

    Can you share your thoughts on conjunctivitis? I feel like people always bring it up as being super contagious. Is it the same explanation as your comments on measles/chicken pox above?

    Thanks!

    1. It is volatile toxins in the eye or in the skin (eyelids) around the eyes being expelled or a toxin that has been introduced into the eye itself. The head, face, and upper back area is a major detoxification point in the body (acne for example) because it is closest to the mouth and includes the brain, both of which store and release many toxins.

  9. Hi sir Jeff!
    I am amazed of the information I’ve read and learned here from you. I am so thankful for this site has brought to my sight.

    However, i am still wondering how the dengue fever came into existence. I got sick which they called “dengue fever” when i was in high school. The fever subsided at dawn but it returned at morning. The fever so severe that my eyes were so painful as if there is burning coal in them. My mother used herbs but it wasn’t subside the fever and it was gettin worst until it appears I could not live anymore so they brought me to the hospital. Pls explain me the science behind it, sir, and why is it so painful sir?

  10. Hello Jeff, Arvid here from youtube comment section.
    Commenting here for the scientific studies about viruses doing what you say they do 🙂

    1. Hi Arvid, here is some information for you—this information deals with the non-contagious factor of viruses:

      Boston and San Francisco – The Failed Infection Attempts – Discussed here in the book, Virus Mania, by Torsten Engelbrecht et al:

      In order to be able to better assess the puzzling mass disease, an attempt to a simulated infection was undertaken with volunteers in Boston in November 1918. These were 62 healthy sailors charged with delinquency and sent to prison. They had been promised a pardon under the condition that they take part in an experiment. 39 of them had not had influenza, so the theory was that they would be particularly susceptible to infection and illness. But the results proved nothing of the sort, as American scientific journalist Gina Kolata describes in her book Influenza (Kalata, Gina, Influenza. Die Jagd nach dem Virus, Fischer, 2003):

      “Navy doctors collected the mucus from men who were desperately ill from the flu, gathering thick viscous secretions from their noses and throats. They sprayed mucus from flu patients into the noses and throats of some men and dropped it into other men’s eyes. In one attempt, they swabbed mucus from the back of the nose of a man with the flu and then directly swabbed one patient’s nasal septum and rubbed it directly onto the nasal septum of one of the volunteers.

      Trying to simulate what happens naturally when people are exposed to flu victims, the doctors took ten of the volunteers onto the hospital ward where men were dying of the disease. The sick men lay huddled on their narrow beds, burning with fever, drifting in and out of sleep in a delirium. The ten healthy men were given their instructions: each was to walk up to the bed of a sick man and draw near him, lean into his face, breathe in his fetid breath, and chat with him for five minutes. To be sure that the healthy man had had a full exposure to the sick man’s disease, the sick man was to exhale deeply while the healthy man drew the sick man’s breath directly into his own lungs. Finally, the flu victim coughed five times in the volunteer’s face.

      Each healthy volunteer repeated these actions with ten different flu patients. Each flu patient had been seriously ill for no more than three days-a period when the virus or whatever it was that was causing the flu should still be around in his mucus, in his nose, in his lungs.

      But not a single healthy man got sick.”

      A comparable experiment, carried out under much stricter conditions, took place in San Francisco, with 50 imprisoned sailors. But, once again, the results did not correspond with what the doctors had expected:

      “Scientists were stunned. If these healthy volunteers did not get infected with influenza despite doctors’ best efforts to make them ill, then what was causing this disease? How, exactly, did people get the flu?” – Virus Mania, pages 226-227.

      These experiments are also discussed in a book by E.W. Cordingley, M.D:

      “Medical doctors are working on the germ theory of disease… But the germ theory is already weakening and is due for being thrown aside. Dr. Fraser of Canada and Dr. Powell of California have experimented with billions of germs of all varieties, but they have been unable to produce a single disease by the introduction of germs into human subjects. Dr. Waite tried for years to prove the germ theory, but he could not do so. During the World War an experiment was conducted at Gallop’s Island Massachusetts, in which millions of influenza germs were injected into over one hundred men at the Government hospital, and no one got the flu. Germs are scavengers.” — Principles and Practice of Naturopathy. E.W. Cordingley, M.D.., N.D.,A.M.

      150 U.S. Public Health Service Experiments from 1919 prove that disease is not transmittable.

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/

      “Perhaps the most interesting epidemiological studies conducted during the 1918–1919 pandemic were the human experiments conducted by the Public Health Service and the U.S. Navy under the supervision of Milton Rosenau on Gallops Island, the quarantine station in Boston Harbor, and on Angel Island, its counterpart in San Francisco. The experiment began with 100 volunteers from the Navy who had no history of influenza. Rosenau was the first to report on the experiments conducted at Gallops Island in November and December 1918.69 His first volunteers received first one strain and then several strains of Pfeiffer’s bacillus by spray and swab into their noses and throats and then into their eyes. When that procedure failed to produce disease, others were inoculated with mixtures of other organisms isolated from the throats and noses of influenza patients. Next, some volunteers received injections of blood from influenza patients. Finally, 13 of the volunteers were taken into an influenza ward and exposed to 10 influenza patients each. Each volunteer was to shake hands with each patient, to talk with him at close range, and to permit him to cough directly into his face. None of the volunteers in these experiments developed influenza. Rosenau was clearly puzzled, and he cautioned against drawing conclusions from negative results. He ended his article in JAMA with a telling acknowledgment: “We entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person. Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”69 (p. 313)

      The research conducted at Angel Island and that continued in early 1919 in Boston broadened this research by inoculating with the Mathers streptococcus and by including a search for filter-passing agents, but it produced similar negative results.70–72 It seemed that what was acknowledged to be one of the most contagious of communicable diseases could not be transferred under experimental conditions.”

      The information is continued and covered in more detail here in issue #3 of my newsletter: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qSFCBMMgUNHgQLMg03O8b4gHAbUaD21W/view?usp=sharing

  11. Dear Jeff,
    I just stumbled on your writings, and have been researching since I heard Dr. Cowan and Dr. Kaufman discussing viruses as being detoxifiers. I have also researched Dr. Antoine Bechamp, Claude Bernard and Gunther Enderlein. I am fascinated with this new paradigm! I am a RN who works in schools–and I stopped believing in vaccines years ago, and support parents who opt out. I take care of a lot of sick kids–and I purposely went to minister to those who turned up positive–hugged them–just to prove that I did not get sick. I have found that when I am stressed–I get sick with a cold.
    This year–year of pandemic–I have been healthy except from bletheritis–which I feel is from a mask. I have never had this before–but forced to wear one at work. I wore plexi glass mask, but am sure the carbon dioxide was irritating the nose and eyes.
    My question is–there are people saying that those getting the vaccine will get us sick, since they will cause mutating viruses in their bodies to spread to us.
    If our bodies produce our own viruses–I don’t think this theory could be possible. I do believe that our bodies can resonate messages to each other–to warn of new invaders–which is why some people get the illusion that we get infections from others—but we cannot get a mutated virus from others, correct?
    I believe structured good water, healthy foods, minerals and sun can help our bodies stay in good health–we are amazingly designed to fight illness, and now I thank my body for getting rid of toxins when I do get sick.

  12. Hi Jeff,

    I hope all is well. Thank you for sharing such important information. I was wondering if you had any information on vaccine shedding? I am now hearing that those who are not vaccinated are unsure of whether it’s safe to be around vaccinated people? A few prominent doctors have voiced concern over this and there are also many accounts and stories of unvaccinated individuals getting sick or not feeling well after being around the vaccinated. I’ve heard something as small as extreme fatigue. I know you say viruses aren’t contagious and I am on board with you about all of that but I am wondering if this new vaccine technology has the potential to be contagious because it has been man made in a lab? And also since the spike proteins (antigens) created in the body by this mRNA will merge with each hosts cells, essentially making them a living virus? I hope I’m making some sense. I would love your feedback. God bless you.

  13. Hello, Jeff. Amazing read on all of your newsletters and responses. This leads me to an epiphany over an illness I had back in 2016. Sick as a dog. Fever (high), body sweat, dizzyness if I tried to stand, could barely sit up in bed, sensitivity to light. Took me about 3 days to “recover” enough so that I can get to the airport (had to cancel the trip on the first day of illness). I was transported via wheelchair (still sensitive to light but much less so at the time) to the boarding plane (first to board!). Took me about another week to fully recover at home.

    I read how you said that taking a vaccine or shot would delay the body’s natural immune response to clean up the built-up toxin to the point the manifested symptoms would become much greater. I remember foregoing a booster shot for tetanus some years ago. I did step on a nail in the late 1990s. Had my tetanus shot. Last shot I ever took. Forego it 10 years later as required as a booster shot. Never took any kind of shots since then (1990s).

    Been wondering since then what could’ve caused my sickness back in 2016. f

  14. Hi Jeff,
    if Stefan Lanka’s theory about viruses simply being produced by the body to clean up toxic waste matter is true – which I don’t doubt – then vaccines that destroy the viruses are doing far more harm than good. Does this go some way to explaining severe adverse reactions to many vaccines? Sounds to me like the vaccines are designed to eliminate one of the bodies own defence mechanisms. Big Pharma will be so happy – more ill people – kerching $

    1. Hi Russell, vaccines do not destroy the virus, since viruses are not alive. As such, you cannot kill a virus. Viruses are not alive to kill. Vaccines merely subvert the detoxification system so that all current detoxifications are halted in order to deal with removing vaccine toxins. Therefore, they give the illusion of ‘stopping the spread’, since the body is not cleansing properly. When you insult the body with a vast amount of toxins all at once, initiating the immune response, you will subsequently halt all current detoxifications which are cleaning and restoring the bodily system in order to now focus its attention on removing vaccine toxicity. That process of removal is slow and takes many months and years, and causes all detoxifications to halt for a long period (except for that of cleansing vaccine toxicity). When the time comes soon down the line, detoxifications are severe since they were not allowed to go through their full processes without molestation.

      Vaccines are akin to a drug high. You have the up, and then the down. Vaccines, like drugs, irritate, agitate and cause cells to become hyperactive. As such, they and the body as a whole will focus immediately attention on removing this irritant (within 24-48 hours) . Vaccines cause the immune response to be elevated to artificially high levels. Cells are irritated by metallic nano-particle adjuvants like thimerosal and aluminum, which are intended to provoke the designed immune response in the injectee. Since the body does not recognize the debris now injected into the body, antibodies are created to cleanse and initiate the infection; antibodies become mutated and stay active for as long as the immune response is artificially elevated. If the substances causes too much toxicity in cells, remaining healthy and somewhat healthy nucleated cells will try to produce adequate solvents (virus) to dissolve/break apart the substance.

      So to answer your question: It’s the opposite. Vaccines produce more viruses in the end because they create more disease.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *